Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Sandeep Kumar Verma vs Govt. Of Nctd on 31 January, 2018

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH MA 4443/2017 in OA 2489/2017 Reserved on: 17.01.2018 Pronounced on: 31.01.2018 Present : Shri Ajesh Luthra, for the applicant Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, for the respondents Shri M.K. Bhardwaj, for interveners MA 4443/2017 has been filed in OA 2489/2017 for impleadment as private respondents. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the interveners that vide Notice No.200 dated 25.10.2017 published on 14.11.2017, candidature of the proposed interveners has been withdrawn in view of the order of this Tribunal dated 12.10.2017 passed in the OA. He stated that in the aforementioned notice dated 25.10.2017, it is stated as under:

"NOTICE NO: 200 TGT (COMPUTER SCIENCE) POST CODE-192/14 IN DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION In supersession of Result Notice No.192 dated 11.10.2017, the candidature of the following candidates is withdrawn till further orders in compliance of the order of the Hon'ble CAT, Delhi dated 12/10/2017 in the matter of Sandeep Kumar Verma & others Vs. GNCTD in O.A. No.2489/2017."

2. The learned counsel vehemently argued that as the candidature of the interveners has been withdrawn due to the order dated 12.10.2017 passed in this OA, their rights are being 2 MA 4443/17 in OA2489/17 prejudiced and, therefore, they should be allowed to be impleaded as interveners.

3. We have perused the order sheets on record. We have not found any order dated 12.10.2017 passed in this matter. If the respondents have passed any order on a wrong information under the shelter of this Tribunal's order, which is having no existence in reality, the contention raised that the interests of interveners are being prejudice is misplaced and as there is no existence of this type of an order, we feel it unnecessary to allow this MA. If the proposed interveners are aggrieved by the respondents action, they can challenge the same in another legal proceeding. Accordingly, MA 4443/2017 is dismissed.

(Praveen Mahajan)                              (Jasmine Ahmed)
Member (A)                                         Member (J)



/dkm/