Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Santosh Shamrao Deshmane vs The State Of Maharashtra on 13 February, 2019

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

osk                                                                     11-ba-1884-2018.odt




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                 CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1884 OF 2018

Santosh Shamrao Deshmane
Age 40 years, Occ. Driver,
Residing at Sai Baba Nagar,
Anand Nagar, Jogeshwari (W.),
Mumbai - 400 102                                       ...       Applicant
           V/s.
The State of Maharashtra                               ...       Respondent


      •    Ms.Mallika Ingle a/w. Mr.R. Thakkar i/b. Mr.Bhanudas L. Jagtap
           for the Applicant.
      •    Mrs.G.P. Mulekar, APP for the Respondent.


                            CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

                            DATE     : 13 th FEBRUARY, 2019.


P.C. :

1]                 The Applicant is seeking bail in C.R. No.16 of 2018

registered with Oshiwara Police Station, Jogeshwari (W.), Mumbai, for

the offence punishable under Section 377, 506(2) of the Indian Penal

Code [for short, "IPC"] and Section 6, 10 and 12 of the Protection of

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [for short, "POSCO Act"].



2]                 The Applicant was arrested on 08/01/2018. The complaint

was lodged by wife of the Applicant alleging that the Applicant had
                                                                                              1/4
      ::: Uploaded on - 15/02/2019                 ::: Downloaded on - 15/02/2019 22:32:42 :::
 osk                                                               11-ba-1884-2018.odt



sexually assaulted their son aged about 14 years. The First

Information Report [for short, "FIR"] and the statement of the victim

child refers to the alleged offence committed by the Applicant. It is

alleged that the Applicant had sexually abused the victim. The

investigation is completed and the Charge-sheet was filed.



3]                 Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the

Applicant is the father of the victim. It is highly impossible that he

would commit the alleged offence. He has been falsely implicated by

his wife. It is submitted that there was monetary dispute between the

Applicant and his wife (complainant), which has resulted in launching

the false prosecution against the Applicant. Learned counsel pointed

out that, the statement of Mr.Anand Ashok Deshmane, who is the

cousin of the Applicant, wherein he has referred to the amount

received by the complainant from the Government, which was being

allegedly demanded by the Applicant and there were disputes between

them. Learned counsel also pointed out the statement of the employer

of the Applicant dated 9th February, 2018, in which he has stated that

the Applicant was employeed with him since 10 years and he has

never noticed any objectionable conduct of the Applicant. Learned

counsel further submits that the medical evidence does not indicate

any injury sustained by the victim.
                                                                                        2/4
      ::: Uploaded on - 15/02/2019           ::: Downloaded on - 15/02/2019 22:32:42 :::
 osk                                                                           11-ba-1884-2018.odt



4]                 Learned APP, however, submits that the complainant as

well as the victim had narrated the incident in the FIR. The victim has

also referred to the incident which has occurred before 5 years ago.

There is no reason for the victim to falsely implicate the Applicant.



5]                 It is further submitted that the victim child has stated that

he was threatened by the father and therefore he had not reported the

earlier incident.



6]                 I     have        perused   the   charge-sheet.       The       Applicant,

complainant and the victim were residing together. There was no

complaint about the earlier incident which had occurred 5 years ago.

The medical evidence is silent. The statement of witness also indicate

that there was dispute between the Applicant and his wife. It is also

noticed that the Applicant is in custody from 8 th January, 2018, which

is almost for the period of 1 year. The trial has not yet commenced. In

these circumstances on certain conditions, bail can be granted.



7]                 Hence, I pass following order :

                                               ORDER

(i) Criminal Bail Application No.1884 of 2018 is allowed and disposed off;

3/4 ::: Uploaded on - 15/02/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 15/02/2019 22:32:42 :::
 osk                                                                        11-ba-1884-2018.odt



                   (ii)     The Applicant is directed to be released on bail in

connection with CR No.16 of 2018 registered with Oshiwara Police Station, on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

(iii) The Applicant shall not enter into the jurisdiction of Oshiwara Police Station and shall not approach the victim or the complainant.

(iv) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.

(v) The Applicant shall furnish the details of his residential address to the Investigating Officer after his release on bail.

[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.] 4/4 ::: Uploaded on - 15/02/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 15/02/2019 22:32:42 :::