Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 26]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Experion Developers Pvt Ltd vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 5 January, 2016

Author: Arun Palli

Bench: Arun Palli

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                        CHANDIGARH


                                                                                    CWP-11918-2014
                                                                         Date of decision:- 05.01.2016

                                Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd.
                                                                                            ...Petitioner
                                                        Versus

                                State of Haryana and others
                                                                                         ...Respondents
            CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

            Present: Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate,
                     for the petitioner.

                                Mr. Amar Vivek, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

                    Mr. Aashish Chopra, Advocate,
                    for respondent No. 3.
                                    ****
            S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (ORAL)

Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the official respondents states that respondent No. 3 has withdrawn its application for the grant of license.

2. The communication of the official respondents dated 17.12.2015 is taken on record and marked as 'X'.

3. The petitioner's grievance, therefore, stands redressed to that extent.

4. The petitioner's application for license will be processed accordingly.

5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

6. Mr. Chopra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3 states that he has no instructions in this regard. However, the petitioner is satisfied with the statement made on behalf of the official respondents that respondent No. 3 has withdrawn the application. This order is passed on the basis of this statement.

(S.J. VAZIFDAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE 05.01.2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.01.05 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh