Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

N.P.Abdul Gafoor vs The Regional Deputy Director (Rdd) on 8 September, 1983

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                               PRESENT:

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

                      FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MAY 2012/14TH VAISAKHA 1934

                                   WP(C).No. 10794 of 2012 (Y)
                                    --------------------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
---------------------
             N.P.ABDUL GAFOOR,
             AL-HILAL HOUSE, MADAVOOR POST OFFICE- 673583
             HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (ARABIC)
             CHAKKALAKKAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL
             PADANILAM POST OFFICE, KOZHIKODE-673571.

             BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
                         SRI.K.M.FIROZ

RESPONDENT(S):
-----------------------

          1. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR (RDD)
              HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE REGION
              KOZHIKODE-673001.

          2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION
              HIGHER SECONDARY DIRECTORATE
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

          3. THE STATE OF KERALA
              REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
              HIGHER EDUCATION (F) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

          4. THE MANAGER
              CHAKKALAKKAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MADAVOOR
              PADANILAM POST OFFICE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673571.

          5. NAVEENAKSHAN.M
              CHAKKALAKKAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MADAVOOR
              PADANILAM POST OFFICE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673571.

          6. RAJI M.K.
              CHAKKALAKKAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MADAVOOR
              PADANILAM POST OFFICE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673571.

             BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
            04-05-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C) NO.10794/2012



                      APPENDIX




PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT-P1:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
KOZHIKODE DATED 08.09.1983 PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO CONTINUE AS FULL
TIME HAS (ARABIC) WITH EFFECT FROM 15.7.1983.

EXHIBIT-P2:- COPY OF THE STAFF LIST OF THE FOURT RESPONDENT'S SCHOOL
SHOWING SENIORITY AS ON 1.6.2011.

EXHIBIT-P3:- COPY OF THE ADVERTISEMENT IN CHANDRIKA DAILY PUBLISHED BY THE
FOURTH RESPONDENT MANAGER INVITING APPLICATIONS TO THE POST OF HSST IN
PHYSICS, BOTANY, ZOOLOGY, ECONOMICS, COMMERCE AND COMPUTER
APPLICATION.

EXHIBIT-P4:-COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.11.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE
PETITIONER BEFORE THE FOURTH RESPONDENT MANAGER PRAYING TO GIVE THE
PETITIONER PROMOTION AS HSST ARABIC.

EXHIBIT-P5:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 12.12.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE
PETITIONER BEFORE THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR (RDD), HIGHER SECONDARY
EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE.



RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS


      NIL


                                                         //TRUE COPY//



                                                         P.A. TO JUDGE




tss



                       A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
                     * * * * * * * * * * * * *
                       W.P.C.No.10794 of 2012
                    ----------------------------------------
               Dated this the 4th day of May 2012

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is working as High School Assistant (Arabic) in the school managed by the 4th respondent since 15/7/1983 which is evident from Ext.P1. It is contended that the petitioner had acquired the qualification of M.A (Arabic), L.T.T.C, S.E.T etc. and going by such qualifications he is entitled to get promotion as H.S.S.T (Arabic) in the Higher Secondary School. It is said that overlooking his seniority and qualification there is an attempt by the manager to appoint other teachers who are junior to the petitioner. He had submitted an application to the Regional Deputy Director, Higher Secondary Education claiming his right which is produced as Ext.P5.

2. The prayer now sought is only for an early disposal of Ext.P5. Since the petitioner has limited his relief only for disposal of Ext.P5, I do not think it is necessary to issue notice to respondents 4 to 6 in the matter. The learned Government Pleader had taken notice for respondents 1 to 3. W.P.C.No.10794/12 2

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of as follows:

There shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P5 and dispose of the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing all the affected parties.
(sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr W.P.C.No.10794/12 3 W.P.C.No.10794/12 4 THOMAS.P.JOSEPH,J.
Crl.M.C.No. of 200
ORDER 19/01/2011