Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras

B Vasan vs M/O Commerce on 8 January, 2020

                                      1                             OA 35/2020




                       Central Administrative Tribunal
                               Madras Bench

                              OA 310/00035/2020

       Dated Wednesday the 8th day of January Two Thousand Twenty

                                 PRESENT

                   Hon'ble Shri. P. Madhavan, Member (J)
                                     &
                    Hon'ble Shri. T. Jacob, Member (A)

B. Vasan
Clerk-cum-Typist
Ambedkar Institute of Productivity
National Productivity Council
Ambatur, Chennai 600 050.                                  ....Applicant

By Advocate M/s. P. Balasubramanian

Vs

1. Union of India
Rep. By Director General
National Productivity Council
Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP)
Ministry of Commerce & Industry
5-6, Institutional Area
LODI Road, New Delhi - 110 003.

2. Director
Ambedkar Institute of Productivity
National Productivity Council
No. 6, Aavin Dairy Road
Ambattur Industrial Estate (North)
Chennai - 600 050.                                         ....Respondents

By Advocate Mr. J. Vasu
                                           2                               OA 35/2020




                                  ORAL ORDER

Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. P. Madhavan, Member(J) The applicant has filed this OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:

"1. To call for the records of the respondents and set aside the order No. 362/Pt.II/2019(File No. 25/27) dated 13.12.2019 and order for consequential benefits.
2. To pass such further or other orders."

2. When the matter came up for consideration, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is working as Clerk-cum-Typist in the 2 nd respondent's office. He was transferred from Chennai to Patna, Bihar Office vide 1st respondent's order dated 13.12.2019. Further he would submit that the transfer has been made without Administrative exigencies. The applicant made representation to the 1st respondent produced as Annexure A4 to revoke the transfer order on compassionate grounds but the same is pending with the respondents for consideration. He submits that the applicant will be satisfied if his representation is disposed of by passing a speaking order within a time limit stipulated by this Tribunal.

3. Mr. J. Vasu takes notice for the respondents.

4. In view of the limited submission made and without going into the substantive merits of the case, the competent authority is directed to consider Annexure A4 representation of the applicant dated 14.12.2019 in accordance 3 OA 35/2020 with law and pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. OA is disposed of at the admission stage.

 (T. Jacob)                                             (P. Madhavan)
 Member(A)                     08.01.2020                 Member (J)
AS