Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sunil Shankar Ghatal vs Kalavati Rajaram Gupta And 6 Ors on 15 November, 2022

Author: Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench: Nitin Jamdar, Sharmila U. Deshmukh

         Digitally signed
       by VIDYA
VIDYA  SURESH AMIN
SURESH Date:
       2022.11.17
AMIN   15:04:05
         +0530




                                                                       1                     28.WP723_2021.doc

                            Vidya Amin
                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 723 OF 2021

                                    Kalavati Rajaram Gupta                          ...     Petitioner
                                         Vs.
                                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                 ..     Respondents

                                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1217 OF 2021
                                                                  IN
                                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 723 OF 2021

                                    Sunil Shankar Ghatal                            ...     Applicant
                                    in the matter between
                                    Kalavati Rajaram Gupta                          ...     Petitioner
                                          Vs.
                                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                 ..    Respondents
                                    None for the Petitioner.
                                    Mr. Abhay Patki, Additional G.P. for the Respondent-State.
                                    Mr. Pradeep Thorat for the Applicant in IA/1217/2021.

                                                        CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND
                                                                SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ.
                                                        DATE    : 15 November 2022.

                                    P.C.:


                                            None for the Petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for Intervenor and learned AGP states that none had appeared for the Petitioner on the earlier date as well. Learned counsel for the Intervenor states that the Petitioner had filed an Appeal under section 247 of the Land Revenue Code, which was dismissed on account of delay by an order dated 23 rd March, 2022. 2 28.WP723_2021.doc According to learned counsel for the Intervenor, as per his instructions, this order is perhaps not challenged further, as no notice has been received by the intervenor. Neither any amendment is sought in this petition.

3. It appears that the Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this petition. Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

4. In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Interim Application does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed of.

(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)