Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 22]

Supreme Court of India

High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Shirish Kumar Rangrao Patil & Anr on 30 April, 1997

Equivalent citations: AIR 1997 SUPREME COURT 2631, 1997 AIR SCW 2592, (1997) 3 APLJ 5, (1997) 3 SCR 1131 (SC), 1997 (3) SCR 1131, 1997 (2) UJ (SC) 152, 1997 UJ(SC) 2 152, (1997) 5 JT 337 (SC), 1997 (3) SERVLJ 260 SC, 1997 (4) SCALE 181, 1997 (6) SCC 339, 1997 (5) JT 337, (1998) ILR (KANT) 501, (1997) 76 FACLR 659, (1997) 3 SCT 32, (1997) 2 SCJ 320, (1997) 4 SERVLR 321, (1997) 5 SUPREME 71, (1997) 4 SCALE 181, (1998) 1 ALL WC 146, (1997) 2 CURLR 30, (1997) 1 GUJ LH 997, (1997) 2 LAB LN 470, 1997 SCC (L&S) 1486, (1998) 1 BOM CR 309, 1997 (99) BOM LR 709, 1997 BOM LR 3 709

Author: D.P. Wadhwa

Bench: D.P. Wadhwa

           PETITIONER:
HIGH COURT  OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYTHROUGH ITS REGISTRAR

	Vs.

RESPONDENT:
SHIRISH KUMAR RANGRAO PATIL & ANR.

DATE OF JUDGMENT:	30/04/1997

BENCH:
D.P. WADHWA




ACT:



HEADNOTE:



JUDGMENT:

O R D E R I agree that appeal be allowed and the writ petition filed by Respondent No.1 dismissed. However, with utmost respect at my command for my learned Brother I do not associate myself with the views expressed by him on corruption. If a certain matter is not relevant for decision on the issue in the case I would refrain from saying anything on that however strongly I may feel about it.