Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Fr.Francis M.J.Fernandez vs The Mahatma Gandhi University on 31 May, 2003

       

  

  

 
 
                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                           PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

                   FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2012/15TH ASHADHA 1934

                                 WP(C).No. 23765 of 2006 (D)
                                     ---------------------------

PETITIONERS :
---------------------
          1. FR.FRANCIS M.J.FERNANDEZ, MANAGER,
             AQUINAS COLLEGE, EDAKOCHI, AQUINAS GROUNDS, KOCHI-6.

          2. P.A.ALEXANDER, SELECTION GRADE LECTURER IN POLITICS
             ACQUINAS COLLEGE, EDAKOCHI, AQUINAS GROUNDS
             KOCHI-6.

          3. JOSEPH JOHN.C, SUPERINTENDENT, AQUINAS COLLEGE,
              EDAKOCHI AQUINAS GROUNDS, KOCHI-6.

          4. MRS.D' CRUZ NOVELLA,
             SELECTION GRADE LECTURER & HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
             DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, AQUINAS COLLEGE, EDAKOCHI
             AQUINAS GROUNDS, KOCHI-16.

             BY ADVS.SRI.N.JAMES KOSHY
                        SRI.T.SANJAY

RESPONDENTS :
-----------------------
          1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
             MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, P.O
             ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM - 686 560.

          2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR,
             MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O.
             ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 560.

          3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE
             EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM.

            R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY
                          ADV.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY
           R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.A.J.JOSE

          THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-07-
2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

AV

W.P.(C).NO.23765 OF 2006

                                  APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 31.5.2003

EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 31.5.2005

EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
         DATED 04.08.2006

EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER PASSED BY THE UNIVERSITY DATED
         7.1.2005

EXT.P4(a) : COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER PASSED BY THE UNIVERSITY DATED
            30.5.2005

EXT.P4(b) : COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER PASSED BY THE UNIVERSITY DATED
            30.6.2005

EXT.P4(c) : COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER PASSED BY THE UNIVERSITY DATED
            6.7.2006

EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED
         11.7.2005

EXT.P5(a) : COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED
            25.7.2005

EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE 4TH PETITIONER AS DDO,
         DATED 31.7.2006

EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND AND 3RD
         PETITIONERS DATED 18.8.2006

EXT.P8 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER
         DATED 18.8.2006


RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL


                                           /TRUE COPY/



                                           P.A TO JUDGE

AV



                   K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
              -------------------------------------------
                  WP(C) NO.23765 OF 2006
             --------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 6th day of July, 2012

                            JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed against the failure to appoint Drawing and Disbursing Officer by M.G.University in one of its Colleges. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University that at present no grievance subsists because an officer has been duly appointed as Drawing and Disbursing Officer as well as Principal in the college at present.

In the said circumstance, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE AV