Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Priyalal J vs Sri. S.M.Vijayanand on 3 December, 2007

Bench: H.L.Dattu, K.M.Joseph

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con Case(C) No. 1546 of 2007(S)


1. PRIYALAL J., S/O. P.A.JOSEPH,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SRI. S.M.VIJAYANAND, S/O. NOT KNOWN
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :03/12/2007

 O R D E R
                         H.L. DATTU, CJ. & K.M. JOSEPH, J.
                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                           Cont. Case (C) No.1546 of 2007
                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                      Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2007.

                                           JUDGMENT

H.L.DATTU, CJ, Complainant in this Contempt Petition alleges that the respondent/contemnor has wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this court in W.P.(C) 37375 of 2003 dated 16th June, 2004,

2. Notice on this contempt petition was ordered to be issued and served on the respondent. He has entered appearance.

3. Pursuant to the direction issued by this court, the respondent/contemnor is present before the court.

4. Today, the respondent has filed an affidavit before this court. Along with it, he has also produced the Notification issued by the State Government dated 27th November, 2007.

5. By the aforesaid Notification, the State Government, in exercise of its powers under sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Kerala Public Services Act, 1968 has framed Special Rules in respect of the qualifications and methods of appointment for various posts under the Kerala Local Self Government Engineering Service.

6. In view of this development, in our opinion, at this stage, we need not have to proceed with this Contempt Petition. Therefore, the contempt petition is dropped. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner, if he so desires, to question the validity or otherwise of the Rules framed by the State Government. COC. 1546/2007.

2

Ordered accordingly.

H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE sb.