Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Court On Its Own Motion vs State Of H.P. And Others on 12 January, 2018

Bench: Sanjay Karol, Ajay Mohan Goel

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPIL No.:                   37 of  2018 Date of Decision:          12.01.2018 ___________________________________________________________________ .

Court on its own motion .....Petitioner.

Vs. State of H.P. and others .....Respondents.

Coram: 

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice.  The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1     For the petitioner: Mr. Rohit Chauhan, Advocate, as Amicus Curiae. 
For the respondents: Mr.   Ashok   Sharma,   Advocate   General, r with   Mr.   J.K.   Verma,   Deputy   Advocate General.  
 
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) :
      
A  letter   petition  received  from  resident  of  Village  and Post Office Bhawarna, Tehsil Palampur, District Kangra is being treated as Public Interest Litigation, wherein it stands mentioned  that there is encroachment upon a water channel, namely,  'Kuhal Diwan Chand' and persons have constructed houses and shops on the same in Bhawarna bazaar.  

2. Notice.   Mr.   J.K.   Verma,   learned   Deputy   Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 

3. Mr. Rohit Chauhan, Advocate, who is present in Court, has been requested to assist the Court as Amicus Curiae. 

1

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 20/05/2018 21:07:26 :::HCHP 2

4. Heard for   some time. At this stage, learned Advocate General has assured the Court that the allegations raised  in the letter petition   shall   be   thoroughly   looked   into   and   in   case   there   is   any encroachment over any Government/public land including 'Kuhal Diwan .

Chand' (water channel), either by way of illegal construction or otherwise, the same shall be positively  removed, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from today. 

5. Learned Amicus Curiae expressed his satisfaction over the assurance so given by the learned Advocate General. 

6. Accordingly,   in   view   of   the   assurance   given   by   the learned Advocate General, we close this letter petition with the direction to the authorities concerned that the matter be thoroughly examined and in   case   it   is   found   that   there   is   any   encroachment   on   the   any Government/public land including 'Kuhal Diwan Chand' (water channel), the same be positively removed, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from today. 

7. We place on record our appreciation for the assistance rendered by learned Amicus Curiae as well as learned Advocate General.

Registry is directed to send a copy of the order to the letter petitioner(s) as also to the Deputy Commissioner, Kangra for compliance of the order. 

Petition stands disposed of in above terms.

 

(Sanjay Karol)        Acting Chief Justice ::: Downloaded on - 20/05/2018 21:07:26 :::HCHP 3   (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 12, 2018      (bhupender) .

rto ::: Downloaded on - 20/05/2018 21:07:26 :::HCHP