Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

S Kulasegaran vs Ut Of Puducherry on 20 March, 2019

                               के ीय सूचना आयोग
                         Central Information Commission
                               बाबा गंगनाथ माग, मुिनरका
                          Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                             नई द ली, New Delhi - 110067


File No : CIC/UTPON/A/2018/114213/SD

S Kulasegaran                                               ....अपीलकता/Appellant
                                      VERSUS
                                       बनाम
CPIO,
Chief Secretariat,
Higher and Technical Education,
Govt. of Puducherry,
Puducherry - 605008.                                   ... ितवादीगण /Respondent

RTI application filed on          :   13/11/2017
CPIO replied on                   :   08/12/2017
First appeal filed on             :   16/12/2017
First Appellate Authority order   :   16/01/2018
Second Appeal dated               :   24/02/2018
Date of Hearing                   :   19/03/2019
Date of Decision                  :   19/03/2019

Information sought

:

The Appellant sought certified copy of the Govt. order prescribing the criteria for admissions in the CENTAC courses of Engineering, MBBS and other seats of Govt. Institutions of Puducherry, in force as on date of RTI Application.
Grounds for the Second Appeal:
The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present:-
Appellant: Present through VC.
1
Respondent: Coulane Satish, Supdt. & PIO, Chief Secretariat, Higher and Technical Education, Govt. of Puducherry, Puducherry present through VC.
Appellant stated that he has asked for PIO's attestation on the Gazette notification referred in the reply provided on 08.12.2017.
PIO submitted that Appellant has been adequately informed that the Gazette notification is available in the public domain. He further stated that the Commission has held in many of its earlier decisions that once information is placed in the public domain, it ceases to be under the control of public authority and the same is excluded from the purview of RTI Act.
Decision Commission observes that the instant Appeal is devoid of any merit as Appellant is insisting on attestation of a Gazette notification which in itself is a frivolous request as a Gazette notification is deemed as a legal source of information and thus do not require any attestation by the PIO.
The appeal is dismissed.
Divya Prakash Sinha ( द काश िस हा ) Information Commissioner ( सूचना आयु ) Authenticated true copy (अ भ मा णत स या पत त) Haro Prasad Sen Dy. Registrar 011-26106140 / [email protected] हरो साद सेन, उप-पंजीयक दनांक / Date 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by User Date: 2019.03.22 13:30:56 IST 3