Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Bhagwan Dass And Anr. vs The State Of Punjab And Ors. on 2 August, 1996

Equivalent citations: (1996)114PLR699B

ORDER
 

N.K. Agrawal, J.
 

1. Heard the counsel for the parties.

2.The precise question in this revision petition is that the plaintiffs had not given a notice under Section 80, Code of Civil Procedure, and, for that reason, an application was filed to withdraw the suit with permission to file a new suit on the same cause of action. From the narration recorded by the Additional Senior Sub Judge on 3.5.1995, it is apparent that the counsel for the plaintiffs wanted permission to withdraw the suit with permission to file fresh suit on the same cause of action. The learned trial Court, however, dismissed the suit as withdrawn without recording permission to file fresh suit on the same cause of action.

3. Since the suit was found not to be maintainable on the ground that a notice under Section 80, Code of Civil Procedure, had not been given to the State of Punjab, it was for that specific reason that the Suit was sought to be withdrawn. Therefore, there were no reasons to withhold permission for filing fresh suit on the same cause of action.

4. The learned counsel for the defendant-State of Punjab has informed that he has no instructions.

5. The plaintiffs-petitioners are, therefore, permitted to file fresh suit on the same cause of action. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.