Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Pradip Hasda And Anr vs The State Of Assam on 27 August, 2020

Author: K.R. Surana

Bench: Kalyan Rai Surana

                                                                            Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010097292020




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                  Case No. : CRL.A(J) 45/2020

            1:PRADIP HASDA AND ANR.
            S/O. DUBRAJ HASDA, R/O. HABIGAON, P.S. THELAMARA, DIST. SONITPUR,
            ASSAM.

            2: RAJU MURMU
             S/O. BIREN MURMU
             R/O. HABIGAON
             P.S. THELAMARA
             DIST. SONITPUR
            ASSAM

            VERSUS

            1:THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REP. BY PP, ASSAM.

Advocate for the Petitioner   :

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM




                                   BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
                     HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIR ALFAZ ALI

                                           ORDER

Date : 27.08.2020 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. M. Phukan, learned APP appearing for the State. This is a jail appeal by the appellant which is received from the Superintendent of Page No.# 2/2 Central Jail, Tezpur, which is treated as appeal u/s 374 (2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 383 Cr.P.C.

The appellant has challenged the judgment and order of conviction dated 30.09.2019 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Sonitpur, Tezpur in Sessions Case No. 156/2015 under Section 302/34 IPC, thereby sentencing the appellant to undergo RI for life and fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with default sentence and to suffer further RI for 2 (two) months.

The appeal is admitted for hearing.

Let the LCR be called for.

Issue notice returnable in 4 (four) weeks. No formal steps is required to be taken as the State is represented.

The Court proposes to appoint Sri Mrinmoy Dutta, Advocate as the Amicus Curiae from out of panel containing Notification No. 33 of this Court.

List after 4 (four) weeks.

                               JUDGE                                JUDGE




Comparing Assistant