Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Siddik @ Matinga Abdulla Badam Shaikh vs State Of Gujarat & on 22 March, 2017

Author: Anant S. Dave

Bench: Anant S. Dave, G.R.Udhwani

                   R/CR.MA/7458/2017                                             ORDER




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 7458 of
                                               2017
                             In CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 590 of 2011

         ===============================================================
                 SIDDIK @ MATINGA ABDULLA BADAM SHAIKH....Applicant(s)
                                       Versus
                         STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
         ===============================================================
         Appearance:
         THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR JM PANCHAL, MR NARENDRA N PRAJAPATI & MR KJ PANCHAL SPL.
         PUBLIC PROSECUTORS for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ===============================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI

                                       Date : 22/03/2017


                                        ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE) 1 The   applicant,   who   is   facing   life  sentence,   and   enhancement   case   along   with   other  Confirmation   Cases   are   heard   and   pending   for  judgment,   has   filed   this   application.     The  request in this application is to grant temporary  bail   to   the   convict   on   the   ground   of   taking  treatment in private hospital at his own cost for  the ailments mentioned in letter dated 10.03.2017  written by the Medical Officer, Vadodara Central  Jail,   Vadodara   to   the   Superintendent,   Vadodara  Page 1 of 5 HC-NIC Page 1 of 5 Created On Mon Aug 14 23:19:22 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/7458/2017 ORDER Central   Jail,   Vadodara.     The   content   of   the  letter dated 10.03.2017 reads as under:

"With reference to the subject cited above  the   Medical   Status   &   condition   of   the  Prisoner   patient   CP   No.­82288   -   Siddik  @Matunga Abdulla Badam is as follows:
1 The patient is known case of Bronchial  Asthma for about 12 [Twelve] years and on  regular treatment by jail physician.
2 On   Dt.09­04­2012,   the   patient  complained   of cough,  breathlessness  for  2  [Two]   months   &   swelling   over   right  inguinal region for 4 [Four] months.
3 On   Dt.09­04­2012   he   was   referred   to  S.S.G.   Hospital,   Vadodara,   where   he   was  examined   &   investigated   by   Physician   &  General   Surgeon.   Their   findings   are   as  follows:
• Sputum   examination   for   Acid­fast  bacillus   i.e.,   for   Tuberculosis   [done   on  Dt: 09­04­2012 & 10­04­2010]: Negative • Chest X­ray : No abnormality detected • Ultra   Sonography   [Prostate,   PRV   &  Bilateral   inguinal   region]   :   No  Sonographic   Abnormality   Detected   in  bilateral inguinal region.
4 Patient   was   examined   by   Assistant  Professor   of   Surgery,   S.S.G.   Hospital,  Vadodara on Dt.09­04­2012 and diagnosed as  right  inguinal  hernia  and   advised   Surgery  on non­urgent basis.
5 Then   after   he   was   frequently   seen   by  medical   officer,   jail   physician   and   jail  surgeon   in   jail   dispensary   and   treated  Page 2 of 5 HC-NIC Page 2 of 5 Created On Mon Aug 14 23:19:22 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/7458/2017 ORDER accordingly.
6 Patient   was   examined   by   jail   surgeon  on Dt.06­01­16, 18­01­16, 25­01­16, 11­02­ 16, 28­03­16, 06­04­16, 18­04­16, 28­04­16  and   02­05­16,   for   his   complaint   of  Bleeding per rectum in known case of right  sided   inguinal   Hernia.     Patient   was  examined,   investigated   treated  accordingly.
7 During   this   period   on   Dt.18­04­16,  patient   was   examined   by   jail   surgeon   for  his   same   above   complaint   and   he   was  advised   to   refer   this   patient   at   S.S.G.  Hospital, Vadodara for Inguinal Hernia and  Bleeding per rectum.   But patient refused  & gave negative consent for same operation  at   S.S.G.   Hospital   as   patient   wants   the  above   operative   treatment   in   private  Hospital  at his  own cost  and  risk as  per  his application dated 07­05­2016.
8 Then   after   patient   was   examined   by  jail surgeon on Dt.31­05­16, 16­09­16, 15­ 06­16,   01­07­16,   14­07­16,   01­08­16,   10­ 08­16,   12­08­16   and   01­09­16   and   he   was  advised   to   refer   this   patient   at  S.S.G.Hospital,   Vadodara   for   Inguinal  Hernia   and   Bleeding   per   rectum.   We   had  asked   for   revoke   order   from   home  department [as the patient is under CrPC­ 268] for further treatment of the patient  on Dt.02­09­2016, but till date no revoke  order had been received.
9 Patient   was   examined   jail   Surgeon   in  last seven months I.e. on Dt.20­09­16, 06­ 10­16,   02­11­16,   11­01­17,   16­01­17,   23­ 01­17,   20­02­17,   27­02­17   &   06­03­17   and  advised conservative treatment.  On Dt.20­ 02­2017   he   was   again   advised   for  Haemorroidectomy   &   Hernioplasty   at  Page 3 of 5 HC-NIC Page 3 of 5 Created On Mon Aug 14 23:19:22 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/7458/2017 ORDER S.S.G.Hospital,   Vadodara.   Again   we   had  asked   for   revoke   order   for   further  treatment of the patient on Dt.09­03­2017.

       At present patient is under treatment  by jail surgeon".

2 Mr.   J.M.Panchal,   learned   Special   Public  Prosecutor for the State, however, would contend  that conditions be imposed at least to see that  convict returns safely to jail upon completion of  treatment.

3 Heard   Mr.   J.M.Panchal,   learned   Special  Public   Prosecutor   and   perused   the   record.     No  doubt   jail   authority   has   recommended   for  temporary suspension of restriction imposed under  Section   268   of   the   Code   of   Criminal   Procedure,  1973 qua the applicant so that he can be treated  at   S.S.G.Hospital,   Vadodara   and   earlier   the  applicant   had   refused   to   undergo   operation   /  treatment   at   S.S.G.Hospital,   Vadodara   and  considering   overall   facts   and   period   of  imprisonment   undergone   by   the   applicant,   we   are  inclined to release the convict on temporary bail  for a period of 7 [Seven] days from the date of  his   release   on   his   furnishing   personal   bond   of  Rs.10,000/­   [Rupees   Ten   Thousand]   only.     This  shall   be   under   adequate   and   sufficient   police  japta.   The convict   shall  not insist  on  entering  any   place   or   premises   which   is   not   within   the  sight   of   accompanying   police   personnel.   The  police   officers   shall   also   take   all   necessary  Page 4 of 5 HC-NIC Page 4 of 5 Created On Mon Aug 14 23:19:22 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/7458/2017 ORDER precautions to bring the convict safely to jail.  The convict shall mark his presence in the office  of   the   Superintendent   of   Police,   Godhra,   on  alternative   days,   during   the   period   he   is   on  temporary bail.

4 With   the   above   direction,   the  application is partly allowed.  

The Registry is directed to communicate this  order to the concerned jail authority, forthwith.

(ANANT S.DAVE, J.) (G.R.UDHWANI, J.) pvv Page 5 of 5 HC-NIC Page 5 of 5 Created On Mon Aug 14 23:19:22 IST 2017