Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Swapna Barman vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 9 June, 2010

Author: Jayanta Kumar Biswas

Bench: Jayanta Kumar Biswas

9.06.10                  In The High Court at Calcutta
 ss                     Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                            Appellate Side

                                      W.P. No. 11638 (W) of 2010
                                           Swapna Barman
                                                  v.
                                    The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                       Mr Hiranmoy Bhattacharyya
                       Ms Suman Sehanabis     ...for the petitioner.

                       Mr Tapabrata Chakraborty
                       Mr Kumaresh Dalal                 ...for the state.

                       Mr Amalesh Roy                 ...for the council.

                The petitioner is alleging that the district primary school council has fixed
          cut off mark in contravention of the recruitment rules. Counsel for the council
          disputes the correctness of the allegation, and submits that the cut off mark has
          been fixed strictly according to the recruitment rules.
                In view of the cut off mark that has been fixed by the council and the mark
          obtained by the petitioner in the examination concerned, the petitioner is not
          entitled to participate in the selection process. This has made the petitioner
          aggrieved. I think the issue involved should be examined after giving the
          respondents opportunity of filing affidavit.

For these reasons, I admit this petition and order that the respondents including the council will be free to proceed with the selection process, conclude the process and make appointment, but that all steps taken by them shall be subject to the result of this petition.

The respondents shall file opposition within five weeks; reply, if any, shall be filed by one week thereafter. Liberty to mention. Certified xerox.

(Jayanta Kumar Biswas, J.)