Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 18]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Gagan Deep vs State Of H.P. And Others on 2 March, 2015

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
                             SHIMLA
                                                          CWP No. 977 of 2015.
                                             Date of decision: 2nd March, 2015.




                                                                                       .
                   Gagan Deep                                              .....Petitioner





                                   Versus
                   State of H.P. and others.                          ......Respondents





           Coram:
           The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice
           The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.





           Whether approved for reporting ?1

           For the petitioner:                       Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Advocate.
           For the respondents:                      Mr.Shrawan      Dogra,   Advocate
                                   r                 General with Mr. Romesh Verma,

                                                     and Mr.Anup Rattan, Additional
                                                     Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K.
                                                     Verma, Deputy Advocate General,
                                                     for the respondent No.1.
                                                     Mr. D.K. Khanna, and Mr. Virender



                                                     Verma, Advocates, for respondents
                                                     No. 2 and 3.




           Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)

Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate has produced the result in the sealed cover. The result was opened in the open Court. The original result is returned to Mr. Khanna, Advocate and photocopy of the same is kept on the file. The petitioner has not made the grade. The petition has become infructuous. Petitioner to seek appropriate remedy. The learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3 to furnish details of marks to the petitioner within one week from today. The petition stands disposed of accordingly, alongwith pending applications, if any.

( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice.

March 02, 2015. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (cm Thakur) Judge.

1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:41:30 :::HCHP