Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore

M/S Pacific Internet India Private ... vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Incoem Tax ... on 15 September, 2017

             IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                      "A" BENCH : BANGALORE

     BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER
      AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                            ITA No.288/Bang/2017
                           Assessment year : 2008-09

    M/s. Pacific Internet India Pvt.     Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of
    Ltd.,                                    Income Tax,
    Unit 2, First Floor, Innovator           Circle 5(1)(2),
    Block, ITPL, Whitefield Road,            Bengaluru.
    Bengaluru-560066.
    PAN : AABCP 2053 Q
               APPELLANT                             RESPONDENT

        Assessee by       : Smt. Aparna Bhandari, CA
        Revenue by        : Shri. B. R. Ramesh, JCIT

                  Date of hearing       : 13.09.2017
                  Date of Pronouncement : 15.09.2017

                                   ORDER

Per Sunil Kumar Yadav, Judicial Member

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), inter alia, on the following grounds:

Ground No. 1

On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Assessing Officer has erred in initiating penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, without recording any adequate reason for such initiation and the learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the same.
Ground No. 2
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned CIT(A) has erred in deciding the case on merit on the ITA No. 288/Bang/2017 Page 2 of 2 ground that in spite of several attempts to contact the Appellant, he had remained unavailable.
Ground No. 3
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in not providing an opportunity to the Appellant to condone the delay in filing of appeal.
The Appellant prays that each of the above grounds be considered discretely and without prejudice to each other.

2. During the course of hearing, the assessee has moved an application for the withdrawal of the appeal to which the Revenue has no objection. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Pronounced in the open court on 15th September, 2017.

                   Sd/-                                         Sd/-
         (INTURI RAMA RAO)                          (SUNIL KUMAR YADAV)
           Accountant Member                           Judicial Member

Bangalore.
Dated:15th September, 2017.
/NShylu/*

Copy to:
1.   Appellants
2.   Respondent
3.   CIT
4 . Guard file
                                                          By order


                                                    Sr. Private Secretary,
                                                      ITAT, Bangalore.