Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mrraviagrawal vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation ... on 8 September, 2015

                         Central Information Commission, New Delhi
                                  File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/901604
                      Right to Information Act­2005­Under Section  (19)




Date of hearing                            :     8th September 2015


Date of decision                           :     8th September 2015



Name of the Appellant                      :     Shri  Ravi Agrawal,
                                                 A­138, Phase­1, Aya Nagar, 
                                                 New Delhi­110047


Name of the Public                         :     Central Public Information Officer,
Authority/Respondent                             Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.,

Hindustan Bhavan, 8, Shoorji Vallabhdas  Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai­ 400001 The Appellant was present in person.

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri S. Subbarao, CPIO was present at the NIC  Studio, Mumbai.

Information Commissioner : Shri Sharat Sabharwal This   matter,   pertaining   to   an   RTI   application   dated   nil   filed   by   the   Appellant,  seeking information on three points in the context of the result of a written examination  conducted by the Respondents, came up today.  The Appellant stated that the information  sought by him was not provided.   The Respondents submitted that the RTI application,  CIC/SH/A/2014/901604 which was filed to the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, was forwarded to them on  19.11.2013.  Since the selection process was still in progress at that stage, the information  was denied.  Subsequently, the Appellant filed another RTI application in July 2014 and  the information sought therein was provided, because the selection process had been  completed by then.  The Appellant stated that the information provided to him in response  to   his   application   of   July   2014   was   with   regard   to   the   completed   selection   process.  However,   in   his   RTI   application   under   consideration   in   this   order,   he   had   sought  information in the context of the result of the written examination, which was announced  on 9.11.2013. He prayed that this information be provided to him.  

2. We have considered the records and the submissions made by both the parties.  The   CPIO   is   directed   to   provide   to   the   Appellant   the   cut   off   marks,   for   the   written  examination, of the Information Systems Officer Stream (point No.1 of the RTI application)  and the information, if any, available on the records of the Respondents with regard to  points No. 2 and 3.   The CPIO should complete action on our above directive within  twenty   days   of   the   receipt   of   this   order,   under   intimation   to   the   Commission.     The  information should be provided free of charge. 

3.  With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of.

CIC/SH/A/2014/901604

4.  Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.

Sd/­ (Sharat Sabharwal) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against application  and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla)       Deputy Registrar CIC/SH/A/2014/901604