Chattisgarh High Court
Kamlesh Kumar Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 6 Wpc/1628/2018 ... on 22 June, 2018
Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
REVP No. 33 of 2018
Kamlesh Kumar Sahu S/o Mohanlal Sahu, aged about 35 years, R/o
Jawaharpara, Balod, Near Dinesh Steels, Police Station and District Balod
(C.G.) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Manpower
Planning, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station - New Raipur, Tahsil and
District Raipur (C.G.)
2. Director, Technical Education Employment and Training, Indrawati Bhawan,
Block No. 3-4, New Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.)
3. Joint Director, Technical Education, Employment and Training, Indrawati
Bhawan, Block No. 3 - 4, New Raipur, Police Station, New Raipur, Tahsil
and District Raipur (C.G.)
4. Chandra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Chhatar Singh Yadav Aged About 30 Years
R/o Village Chuhipali, P.O. Patelpali, Tehsil And District Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh, Pin 496001, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
5. Yogendra Kumar Verma S/o Shri Girchand Verma Aged About 34 Years R/o
Nutan Chowk, Near Shiv Mandir, Bhilai-3, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, Pin
490021, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
6. Virendra Kumar Chowdhary S/o Shri Ajamber Singh Chowdhary Aged About
30 Years R/o Village Bansia, P.O. Tarkela, Tehsil And District Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
7. Sanjay Kumar Patel S/o Shri Sant Ram Patel Aged About 36 Years R/o
B.E.O. Office Lailunga, Tehsil Lailunga, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, Pin
496113, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
8. Sunil Kumar Sao S/o Shri Santram Sao Aged About 30 Years R/o 75/960
Kelo Vihar Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh,
Chhattisgarh
9. Jayant Sahu S/o Shri Arjun Singh Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Village
And Post Palari, Tehsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod,
Chhattisgarh
10. Tukeshwar Lal Kewant S/o Shri Puniram Kewant Aged About 35 Years R/o
Village Mahuadih, P.O. Lakhli, Via Bahmnidih, Tehsil Champa, District
Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
11. Rajeev Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Mohanlal Dewangan Aged About 34
Years R/o Village Pantora, Tehsil And Thana Baloda, District Janjgir-
Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
2
12. Jhablesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Tirath Ram Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o
Village Sakri, P.O. Chandi, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh,
Pin 493661, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
13. Indralal S/o Shri Santlal Aged About 37 Years R/o Village And P.O. Nardha,
Thana Jamul, Tehsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, Pin 490024,
District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
14. Kirtan Lal Patle S/o Late Shri Tirith Ram Patle Aged About 44 Years R/o
Village And P.O. Kapan, Via Akaltara, Tehsil Akaltara, District Janjgir-
Champa, Chhattisgarh, Pin 495552, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
15. Narendra Kumar Kashyap S/o Dharam Singh Kashyap Aged About 34 Years
R/o Village Kongera (Vishrampuri) P.O. Korgaon, Tehsil Vishrampuri, District
Bastar, Chhattisgarh, Pin 494347, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
16. Amvil Vimon Kumar Minj S/o Masih Prakash Minj Aged About 32 Years R/o
Village Gowardhanpur, P.O. Boirdadar, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh,
District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
17. Aradhana Nath D/o Shri Dipankur Samual Nath Aged About 35 Years R/o
Ganesh Nagar, Nagar Panchayat Office, Behind Tifra, P.O. Tifra, District
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Pin 495223, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
18. Roopesh Kumar Pradhan S/o Shri Purandar Pradhan Aged About 31 Years
R/o Jail Road, Saraipali, P.O. Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh,
Pin 493558, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
19. Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog Through Its Secretary, Raipur, Police Station Civil
Lines, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur,
Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Rajkumar Jaiswal, Advocate. For Respondents/ State : Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 22/06/18
1. This review petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 05.02.2018 passed in WP(S) No. 1133 of 2018.
2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the record, I do not find any legal error apparent on the face of the record in the order under review.
33. Accordingly, the review petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed.
SD/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka