Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 February, 2023

Author: Prithviraj K. Chavan

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere, Prithviraj K. Chavan

         Digitally
         signed by
         SHAGUFTA
SHAGUFTA Q PATHAN
Q PATHAN Date:
         2023.02.23                                                      17-WP-3894-2022.odt
         10:48:07
         +0530


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                          CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3894 OF 2022


                Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique                    ...Petitioner
                     Versus
                The State Of Maharashtra                           ...Respondent


                Mr. Sagar Batavia i/b Mr. Anees Shaikh for the Petitioner

                Mr. J. P. Yagnik, A.P.P for the Respondent-State

                                        CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                 PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.

TUESDAY, 21st FEBRUARY 2023 P.C :

1 The aforesaid petition is kept today for recording compliance of the order dated 28.11.2022, inasmuch as, it directs the State Government to pay costs of Rs.25,000/- to the petitioner.
2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received the said amount. Learned A.P.P has SQ Pathan 1/2 17-WP-3894-2022.odt tendered a photocopy of the report of the Special DIG-Suhas Warke dated 13.02.2023. The same is taken on record. In the said report, in para 3, it is stated that appropriate steps will be taken, after inquiry, to recover Rs. 25,000/- imposed as costs, from the Officers, who are responsible for registration of the FIR and for filing charge-sheet.
3 Stand over to 08.03.2023 to enable the learned A.P.P to submit a report as to whether the costs are recovered from the salary of the concerned Officers as stated above.

PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2