Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Chaman Lal vs State Of H.P. & Others on 23 April, 2015

Bench: Rajiv Sharma, Sureshwar Thakur

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA




                                                             .
                                         CWP No. 1282 of 2015





                                     Date of Decision: 23.4.2015





    Chaman Lal
                                                     Petitioner
                         Versus

    State of H.P. & others





                                               ...Respondents
    ___________________________________________________________
    Coram

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.

    Whether approved for reporting?
    _________________________________________________________
    For the petitioner       :      Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advocate.

    For the respondent :       Mr.     M.A. Khan, Additional


                               Advocate General with Mr. P.M.
                               Negi, Deputy Advocate General,
                               and    Mr.   Ramesh    Thakur,
                               Assistant Advocate General, for




                               the respondent-State.





    Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):

Reply not filed. The right to file reply stands closed.

2. Petitioner was offered appointment vide office order dated 23.11.2013, Annexure P-1. He has also entered into an agreement with respondent No. 2, vide Annexure P-2.

However, surprisingly the services of the petitioner were terminated by respondent No. 3, Principal, Govt. Degree ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:03:06 :::HCHP 2 College, Barsar. The services of the petitioner could only be .

terminated by appointing authority not by the Principal.

3. Consequently, Annexure P-10 is quashed and set aside. Respondent No. 3, Principal, Govt. Degree College, Barsar is ordered to permit the petitioner to discharge his duties as a Clerk, in accordance with law.

4. In view of this, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs.

(Rajiv Sharma), Judge (Sureshwar Thakur), Judge April 23 2015 (kalpana) 2 ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:03:06 :::HCHP