Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Ms.Tanmayee Ranjan vs Insurance Division on 11 January, 2011

              Central Information Commission
Room No.296, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama 
                     Place, New Delhi­110066
     Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

      Adjunct to Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2010/000660 


Appellant /Complainant          :     Smt. Tanmayee Ranjan, 
Ghaziabad 
Public Authority                 :    The Oriental Insurance 
Co. Ltd.,N.Delhi
                                (Sh. P.K. Jha, Dy.General 
Manager, 
                                CPIO  and Shri V.V. Mohlla, 
Manager)  
Date of Hearing                 :      ­

Date of Decision                :     11.01.2011

Facts:­ 

1. In   pursuance     of     non   compliance     of     the  Commission's   directions   in   case   No.  CIC/DS/A/2010/000660   Dated   16.7.2010,   the   CPIO,   The  Oriental   Insurance   Company   Ltd.,     was   directed   to  explain the reasons on which the information has not  been   provided   to   the   appellant   even   though   over   2  months     had   elapsed     since     the   passing   of   the  Commission's order - vide   Commission's notice dated  1.10.2010. 

2. In   response,   the   CPIO   has   stated   that   the  Commission's decision was conveyed to NIA and GIPSA.  GIPSA was asked vide letter dated 5th  August, 2010 to  obtain   a   copy   of   the   answer   sheet   from   NIA   and  provide the same to the CPIO. 

3. Vide   letter   dated   13th  August,   2010   GIPSA  informed   the   Personnel   Department   of   OIC   regarding  the   inability   to   comply   with   the   Commission's   order  due   to   not   having   a   mandate   from   the   member  companies. 

4. The  order  of the  CIC was  then sent  by Oriental  Insurance   Co.   Ltd.   to   National   Insurance   Academy  (NIA)   with   a   request   to   provide   a   copy   of   the   said  answer sheet of the applicant.   As per   letter dated  4.10.2010   from   OIC,   "NIA,   Pune   has     replied   vide  letter   dated   9.9.2010   (Ref   our   letter   dated  20.8.2010)   stating   that   as   per   the   Professional  Service   Agreement   between   GIPSA   and   NIA   (dated  01.02.2007)   -   Article   2   :   NIA's   obligations,   point  2.7   clearly   states   that   "GIPSA   will   retain   the  ownership of the copyright and all other intellectual  property   rights   ("IPR")     vested   in   Deliverables".  In view of the forgoing we are unable to obtain the  required   information   in   spite   of   our   best   efforts  either from GIPSA or from NIA." 

Decision 

5. After   perusing   the   facts   on   record   the  Commission can not agree with a view that  evaluation  of   answer   scripts   is   a   'Deliverable"   since   no  economic   value   can   be   attributed   to   answer   scripts.  Therefore,   the   plea   on   which   the   answer   scripts   is  being   denied   is   bad   in   law   and   will   not   stand  judicial   scrutiny.     Furthermore   in   view   of   NIA's  letter dated 23.12.2009 addressed to Chief Executive,  GIPSA   proposes     that   the   custody   of   questions   and  answer   sheets     should   be   with   the   GIPSA   since   on  account   of   constraint   of   space,   NIA   was   having  difficulty   in   maintaining   the   same,   it   can   not   be  held   by   GIPSA   that   they   are   not   the   holders   of  information.   Similarly   no   professional   Service  Agreement between GIPSA (which is a public authority)  and NIA can over ride the provisions of the RTI Act  and   GIPSA   is   obliged   to   satisfy   the   orders     of   the  Commission   by   providing   answer   sheet   to   the  appellant.  Through  this order the Commission issues  notice   to   the  CPIO, GIPSA  to   show   cause   why   penalty  should not be imposed upon him for not having carried  out his mandated functions   as per the provisions of  the   RTI   Act,   2005.     Opportunity   of   personal   hearing  is   provided   to   him   on   4.2.2011   dated   12.30   PM   for  which   he   is   directed   to   present   himself   before   the  Commission .  Appellant may attend the hearing if she  so desires. 

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T.K.Mohapatra) Under  Secretary & Dy. Registrar Copy to:­
1. Smt. Tanmayee Ranjan, 123/2, 2nd. Floor,  Sector.III A,. Vaishali Distt: Ghaziabad (UP). 
2. Shri P.K. Jha Dy.General Manager, CPIO The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Oriental House, P.B. No.7037 A­25/27, Asaf Ali Road,  New Delhi­110002.

3. The Appellate Authority The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Oriental House, P.B. No.7037 A­25/27, Asaf Ali Road,  New Delhi­110002. 

 

4. The Central Public Information Officer General Insurance (Public Sector) Association of  India 3rd. Floor, Jeevan Vihar (Rear portion) Sansad Marg, New Delhi­110001.