Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 13]

Chattisgarh High Court

Abhishek Kumar Sharma And Anr vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. 6 ... on 10 August, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                        1

                                                                                        NAFR

                        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                           WPC No. 238 of 2013

                1. Abhishek Kumar Sharma S/o Lt Poonamchand Sharma, Aged About 35
                   Years, R/o Shani Mandir Raigarh, P.S. And Post Raigarh, Distt Raigarh,
                   Chhattisgarh

                2. Abhinav Sharma S/o Lt Poonamchand Sharma R/o Shani Mandir, Raigarh,
                   P.S. And Post Raigarh, Distt Raigarh, Chhattisgarh  ---- Petitioners

                                                  Versus

                1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Deptt Of Urban Administration,
                   DKS Bhawan, Raipur, P.S. Civil Lines, Head Post Office Raipur, Distt Raipur,
                   Chhattisgarh

                2. The Collector Raigarh, P.S. And Distt Raigarh, District : Raigarh,
                   Chhattisgarh

                3. Municipal Corporation Raigarh,           Through Commissioner, Municipal
                   Corporation, Raigarh, P.S. And           Distt Raigarh, District : Raigarh,
                   Chhattisgarh

                4. Nazul Officer Raigarh, P.S. And Distt Raigarh, District : Raigarh,
                   Chhattisgarh

                5. Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, P.S. And Distt
                   Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh         ---- Respondents

For Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate. For Respondents No.3 & 5 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondents / State : Mr. R. N. Pusty, G. A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 10/08/18

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits alternative land has been provided to the petitioner and as such, no cause of action survives for consideration.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka