Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Chattisgarh High Court

Dinesh Kumar Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh 43 Wps/7128/2017 ... on 16 January, 2018

Author: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

                                                                                                               NAFR

                         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                            WPS No. 6766 of 2017

                Dinesh Kumar Yadav S/o Late Shri Chhedilal Yadav, Aged About 32
                Years Presently Working As Station Incharge, Sub Inspector, District
                Sukma , Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh

                                                                                             ---- Petitioner

                                                       Versus

             1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home
                Police Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur,
                Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh

             2. Director General Of Police , Police Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur,
                Chhattisgarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

             3. Director General Of Police Naxal Operation Police Headquarter, Raipur,
                District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

             4. Inspector General Of Police Bastar Range Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. ,
                District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh

             5. Superintendent Of Police, S. I. B., Police Headquarter, Raipur,
                Chhattisgarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

             6. Superintendent Of Police, Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh. ,
                District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh

                                                                                         ---- Respondents

        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For petitioner : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, Advocate For State : Mr. Majid Ali, GA

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 16/01/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive if grievance is not redressed.

2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit