Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Orai Tuime Daimari vs Union Of India And 4 Ors on 25 October, 2024

Author: Suman Shyam

Bench: Suman Shyam

                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010205602024




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/5124/2024

         ORAI TUIME DAIMARI
         S/O- DR. ANJALI DAIMARI, R/O- KANISKA APARTMENT, LANKESHWAR,
         P.O. JALUKBARI, P.S. JALUKBARI, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781013.



         VERSUS

         UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI,
         PIN- 110011.

         2:THE AIR CHIEF MARSHAL

          INDIAN AIR FORCE
          AIR HEADQUARTERS (AIR HQ)
          VAYU BHAWAN
          NEW DELHI-110011.

         3:THE CENTRAL AIRMEN SELECTION BOARD (CASB)

          REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT (AIR COMMODORE)
          7 ASC (AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS CENTRE)
          7 ASC (AERONAUTICAL SYSTEM CENTRE) NO. 1 CUBBON ROAD
          BANGALORE (KARNATAKA)
          PIN- 560001.

         4:THE APPEAL MEDICAL BOARD

          REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
          AMB
          AFS JALAHALLI (EAST)
          BENGALURU
          PIN- 560015.
                                                                                    Page No.# 2/2


            5:THE RECRUITMENT MEDICAL OFFICER
             STATION MEDICARE CENTRE
            AIR FORCE STATION
            YELAHANKA
             BENGALURU
             PIN- 560063

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M SARANIA, MS. R D MOZUMDAR,MR
R.BEZBARUAH,MR A SARANIA,N GOGOI

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.,




                                   BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

                                           ORDER

25.10.2024 Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned Central Govt. Counsel appearing for the respondents has questioned the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of want of territorial jurisdiction by contending that all the respondents are from Bangaluru and therefore, it is the High Court of Judicature at Karnataka which will alone have the jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition. Responding to the above, Ms. R. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for posting this case again on 29.10.2024 so as to enable her to obtain instruction.

Prayer allowed.

List this matter again on 29.10.2024 as a fixed item. Interim order passed earlier to continue till the next date.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant