Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Abdul Rahman vs The Deputy Chief Controller Of ... on 1 August, 2016

Author: P.B.Suresh Kumar

Bench: P.B.Suresh Kumar

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                              PRESENT:

                      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

            THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/17TH BHADRA, 1938

                                   WP(C).No. 24710 of 2016 (K)
                                        ----------------------------


PETITIONER :
-----------------------


                ABDUL RAHMAN,AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.C.H.ABDULLA,
                BEDISAN MAHAL, R.D.NAGAR (P.O.),
                KASARAGOD.


                     BY ADVS.SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN
                               SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA
                               SRI.O.K.MURALEEDHARAN

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

        1. THE DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES
            KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM.

        2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE,
           KASARAGOD -671 121.


           *ADDL.R3 IMPLEADED

            *Addl.R3. SRI. BHASKARAN. S., AGED 38 YEARS,
                          S/O SOMAPPA POOJARI, NEAR CASHEW FACTORY,
                          TALIPPADAPPU, KASARGODE.

          *IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 01/08/2016.


                     R1 BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
                             ADV. SRI.P.L.VENUKUMAR, CGC
                     R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R.DEEPA


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 08-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:


sts

WP(C).No. 24710 of 2016 (K)
-----------------------------------------

                                               APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
---------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1          TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
                    DATED -3-2016

EXHIBIT P2          TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31/3/2016 IN WRIT PETITION
                    12300/2016

EXHIBIT P3          TURE COPY OF THE ORDER IN WRIT PETITION 12300/2016
                    DATED 4/4/2016

EXHIBIT P4          TRUE COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE NO.D5/3487/D.DIS.
                     ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER ON 4/6/2016, BY THE RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P5          TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 15/6/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE
                    PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P6          TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR EXPLOSIVE LICENCE
                    SUBMITTED BY THE PETITOINER ON 18/7/2016 WITH
                    REPRESENTATION DT. 18/7/2016

EXHIBIT P7          TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION SENT BY THE 1ST
                    RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19/7/2016 WITH A
                    COPY OF REPRESENTATION FILED BY ONE BHASKARAN

EXHIBIT P8          TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT PETITION 33443/2015 DATED
                    3/11/2015




RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:                           NIL
--------------------------------------------




                                                        /TRUE COPY/


                                                        P.A.TO JUDGE


sts



                     P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

                  WP(C).No.24710 of 2016-K.

                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

            Dated this the 8th day of September, 2016.

                          J U D G M E N T

It is seen that the licence applied for by the petitioner under the Explosive Rules, 2008 is not being issued on account of the pendency of Contempt Case (C).No.865 of 2016 before this Court. It is seen that Contempt Case (C).No.865 of 2016 was closed on 22.8.2016. In the circumstances, the first respondent is directed to take a final decision on Ext.P6 application preferred by the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

Kvs/-

// true copy //