Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Karamvir Parcha And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 12 September, 2017

Author: Anupinder Singh Grewal

Bench: Anupinder Singh Grewal

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

257                               CRM-M-18805-2017
                              DATE OF DECISION: 12.09.2017



KARAMVIR PARCHA AND ORS.                                   ... Petitioner(s)

                                Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.                             ... Respondent(s)

CORAM:     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present:   Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate
           for the petitioner(s).

           Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Addl.A.G., Haryana

                ****

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

The petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.114 dated 22.01.2017, under Sections 323, 504,506, 34, 379-B IPC registered at Police Station City Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) and all consequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 01.05.2017 (Annexure P-2).

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the allegations in the FIR are that petitioners have removed the jacket of the complainant along with Rs.10,000/- and a mobile phone. He further states that the petitioners had been arraigned as accused on account of misunderstanding and now the matter has been compromised.

A Coordinate Bench by the order dated 31.05.2017 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to record the statements of the parties with regard to genuineness of the compromise and send a report to this Court. The report of 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 17-09-2017 19:37:52 ::: CRM-M-18805-2017 2 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari dated 14.07.2017 has been received, wherein it is stated that in pursuance to the order of this Court, the statements of the parties were recorded which indicates that the compromise is genuine, without any coercion or undue influence.

The FIR is outcome of some misunderstanding, which has now been resolved and the matter has been compromised.

In view of the mandate of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Narinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the criminal proceedings. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No.114 dated 22.01.2017, under Sections 323, 504,506, 34, 379-B IPC registered at Police Station City Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) and all consequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed qua the petitioner(s).




12.09.2017                       (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
SwarnjitS                                 JUDGE


                 Whether speaking/reasoned :       Yes / No
                 Whether reportable          :     Yes / No




                                 2 of 2
              ::: Downloaded on - 17-09-2017 19:37:53 :::