Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Anglican Church Of India(Cipbc) vs C.S.I., Madhya Kerala Maha Edavaka ... on 24 March, 2023

Author: C.S.Dias

Bench: C.S.Dias

OP(C) No.347/2018                                 1/1

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                        PRESENT
                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
                Friday, the 24th day of March 2023 / 3rd Chaithra, 1944
                                 OP(C) NO. 347 OF 2018

                    OS No.53/2004 OF MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, SASTHAMKOTTA

   PETITIONERS:

       1. ANGLICAN CHURCH OF INDIA(CIPBC), ECLICIASTICAL THIRUKOCHI, CMS
          ANGLICAN MAHAIDAVAKA (ACREDITED), TRAVANCORE KOCHI, DIOCESAN TRUST
          ASSOCIATION (T.C.D.T.A), PROTECTION RIGHTS COUNCIL MEMBER AND
          IVERKALA, CMS CHURCH WORKER, M. PATHROSE, S/O. MANUEL, MOOLAPURA,
          IVERKALA NADUVILE MURI, KUNNATHOOR VILLAGE.


                AND ANOTHER

   RESPONDENTS:

       1. C.S.I., MADHYA KERALA MAHA EDAVAKA BISHOP, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.

            AND ANOTHER

        Op (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances stated in
   the affidavit filed along with the OP(C) the High Court be pleased to pass
   an order staying all further proceedings in OS No. 53/2004 on the files of
   the Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate, Sasthamcotta, pending disposal of the
   above original petition (C).


        This petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the petition
   and the affidavit filed in support of OP(C) and this courts order dated
   23.09.2022 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S P.R.VENKETESH,
   G.KEERTHIVAS, Advocates for the petitioners, and of M/S BABU KARUKAPADATH,
   M.A.VAHEEDA BABU, E.M.ABDUL KHADER, K.M.FAIZAL, P.U.VINOD KUMAR, MITHUN
   BABY JOHN, AMRIN FATHIMA & RAHUL ROY, Advocates for the respondent 1 and
   of Sri. RAJESH.K.RAJ, Advocate for the respondent 2, the court passed the
   following:

                                             ORDER

The interim order dated 06-02-2018 is extended by six months.

Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE 24-03-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar