Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Sambhal Dignostic Centre vs Dost Mohammad on 16 May, 2016

  	 Cause Title/Judgement-Entry 	    	       STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP  C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010             Revision Petition No. RP/73/2016  (Arisen out of Order Dated 02/04/2016 in Case No. C/145/2015 of District Shambhal)             1. Sambhal Dignostic Centre  Sambhal ...........Appellant(s)   Versus      1. Dost Mohammad  Sambhal ...........Respondent(s)       	    BEFORE:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN PRESIDENT          For the Petitioner:  For the Respondent:     	    ORDER   

 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,                                    UTTAR PRADESH, LUCKNOW                                        REVISION NO. 73 OF 2016             Sambhal Diagnostic Centre and another                                                                         ...Revisionists/Opposite Parties                                                              Vs. Dost Mohammad                                                                           ...Respondent/Complainant   BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN, PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. J N SINHA, MEMBER HON'BLE MRS. BAL KUMARI, MEMBER   For the Revisionists    :    Mr. Satya Prakash Pandey, Advocate.
For the Respondent     :                       -

 

Dated : 16-05-2016

 

                                                   JUDGMENT

 

          MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN, PRESIDENT (ORAL)               Heard learned Counsel for the revisionist and perused the impugned order.
            By impugned order dated 02-04-2016, the District Consumer Forum has allowed amendment application moved by complainant on payment of cost of Rs.200/- to opposite party. The amendment of pleadings is permissible. The revisionist is at liberty to raise his plea and adduce his evidence before the District Consumer Forum. We found no illegality in the impugned order.
            The revision is dismissed summarily.
Let copy of this order be made available to the parties as per rules.
 
                                                                                   (JUSTICE A H KHAN)                                                                                                     PRESIDENT                                                                                                       ( J N SINHA )                                                                                                       MEMBER                                                  ( SMT. BAL KUMARI )                                                                    MEMBER pnt         [HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN] PRESIDENT