Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Bro. Bankras vs The District Collector on 2 March, 2020

Author: P.D.Audikesavalu

Bench: P.D.Audikesavalu

                                                                    W.P.(MD) No.1081 of 2017

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 02.03.2020

                                                     CORAM:

                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE. P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

                                              W.P.(MD)No.1081 of 2017

                  Bro. Bankras,
                  Correspondent,
                  Sacred Heart Higher Secondary School,
                  Panagudi,
                  Radhapuram Taluk,
                  Tirunelveli District.                                     ... Petitioner

                                                        Vs.

                  1.The District Collector,
                   Tirunelveli District,
                   Tirunelveli.
                  2.The Assistant Director,
                   Town Panchayat's,
                   Tirunelveli District,
                   Tirunelveli.
                  3.The Executive Officer,
                   Town Panchayat,
                   Panagudi,
                   Radhapuram Taluk,
                   Tirunelveli District.
                  4.A.Sankaralingam                                         ... Respondents




                  1/4

http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                         W.P.(MD) No.1081 of 2017

                  Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
                  for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the
                  impugned order made by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.
                  316/2016 dated 09.12.2016 in favour of 4th respondent to make construction of an
                  Anganwadi Building at Mangammal Salai in Survey No.131/B at Panagudi
                  Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District, just opposite to the northern gate
                  of the Petitioner's school namely Sacred Heart Higher Secondary School,
                  Panagudi, thereby blocking Petitioner's entry to the above school and quash the
                  same as illegal.


                                  For Petitioner           : Mr.T.R.Janarthanam
                                                             for M/s.S.R.Anbarasu

                                  For Respondents 1 & 2    : Mr.R.Murugan
                                                             Government Advocate

                                  For 3rd Respondent       : Mr.G.Muthukannan


                                                       ORDER

Heard Mr.T.R.Janarthanam, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr.R.Muguan, Learned Government Advocate for Respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.G.Muthukannan, Learned Counsel for the Third Respondent and perused the materials available on record apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2/4

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.(MD) No.1081 of 2017

2. The Petitioner in this Writ Petition challenges the order in Na.Ka.No. 316/2016 dated 09.12.2016 passed by the Third Respondent in favour of the Fourth Respondent for construction of a building for Anganwadi Project at Mangammal Salai in Survey No.131/B at Panagudi Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District, just opposite to the Northern Gate of the School of the Petitioner, which would block its entry.

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the First and Second Respondents on instructions states that the aforesaid Anganwadi Project has been dropped by Proceedings of the First Respondent in Se.Mu.Na.Ga.No. 2071/Aa3/2014 dated 04.02.2019 and produced a copy of the same. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner acknowledges its receipt. In view of the subsequent events, nothing remains for further consideration in the Writ Petition.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed. No costs.

02.03.2020 Internet:Yes/No Index :Yes/No sj Note: Issue copy on 20.03.2020 3/4 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.(MD) No.1081 of 2017 P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

sj To

1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Assistant Director, Town Panchayat's, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

W.P.(MD)No.1081 of 2017

02.03.2020 4/4 http://www.judis.nic.in