Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of Maharashtra vs Jayvijay Shrikant Pandit on 6 February, 2015

Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, S.A. Bobde

               ITEM NO.6                       COURT NO.4                     SECTION IX
                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

               Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s).
               19277/2014
               (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated
               02/08/2013 in WP No. 865/2013 passed by the High Court Of
               Bombay)

               STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR                                        Petitioner(s)
                                                          VERSUS
               JAYVIJAY SHRIKANT PANDIT                                           Respondent(s)
               (with appln. (s) for c/delay                 in   filing   SLP   and c/delay in
               refiling SLP and office report)

               Date : 06/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

               CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE

               For Petitioner(s)            Mr. Shankar Chillarge, Adv.
                                            for Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,AOR(NP)

               For Respondent(s)            Mr. V. Prakash, Adv.
                                            Ms. Khushboo Arora, Adv.
                                            for Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,AOR(NP)

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

There is an inordinate delay of 242 and 109 days respectively in filing and refiling the special leave petition. Sufficient explanation has not been offered to condone the delay. Even on merits, we find no good ground to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

The special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by Parveen Kumar Chawla Date: 2015.02.06 15:36:54 IST Reason:

               (Parveen Kr. Chawla)                                       (Renuka Sadana)
                   Court Master                                            Court Master