Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Commissioner Of Income Tax - I vs Kailashchand on 12 June, 2012

Author: Vijay Manohar Sahai

Bench: Vijay Manohar Sahai

  
	 
	 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - I....Appellant(s)V/SKAILASHCHAND MITTAL (HUF)....Opponent(s)
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	O/TAXAP/1978/2010
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 

 


 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


 


 


TAX APPEAL  NO. 1978 of
2010
 


 


 


 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

 

			
		
	

 

===========================================================
 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

COMMISSIONER
			OF INCOME TAX - I....Appellant(s)
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 Versus
			
			
		
	
	 
		 
			 

KAILASHCHAND
			MITTAL (HUF)....Opponent(s)
		
	

 

===========================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MRS
MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Appellant.
 

MR
SN DIVATIA, ADVOCATE for the the Opponent.
 

===========================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 12/06/2012
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI)

1. Heard Ms.Mauna M.Bhatt, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.S.N.Divetia, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. Admit. We formulate the substantial question of law as under:

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law in remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for giving one more opportunity to the assessee to prove identity,creditworthiness, capacity and genuineness of donors, in absence of a finding that the Assessing Officer has not given adequate and proper opportunity to the assessee to prove the case of the assessee ?

3. Issue notice to the respondent. Paper book be filed within three months.

(V.M.SAHAI, J.) (N.V.ANJARIA, J.) VCDarji Page 2 of 2