Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Agarwal Insulators Pvt. Ltd. And 3 Ors vs Indusind Bank Ltd on 17 June, 2019

Author: R.D. Dhanuka

Bench: R.D. Dhanuka

kvm
                                         1/3
                                                                      6-ARBP164.19



       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
            ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
            ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 164 OF 2019
                        ALONGWITH
              NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 247 OF 2019
                            IN
            ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 164 OF 2019

Agarwal Insulators Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.                     ..... Applicants/
                                                        Petitioners
     VERSUS
IndusInd Bank Ltd.                                      ..... Respondent

Mr.Nikhil N. Wadikar, i/b. Mr.Nandu Vishnu Pawar for the
Applicants/Petitioners.

Mr.Murlidhar Kale, i/b. M/s.O.M.Gujar Law Chambers for the
Respondent.

Mr.Tushar Bhor, Legal Manager of the Respondent company present.

                                      CORAM :      R.D. DHANUKA, J.
                                      DATE     :   17th JUNE, 2019
P.C.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent on instruction from Mr.Tushar Bhor, Legal Manager of the respondent company who is present in court states that his client has no objection if the impugned award dated 22nd September,2017 passed by the learned arbitrator is set aside and if the matter is remanded back for adjudication before another arbitrator. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also no objection for setting aside the impugned award and for remanding the matter back to another arbitrator. Statements ::: Uploaded on - 20/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 01:26:47 ::: kvm 2/3 6-ARBP164.19 made by both the parties are accepted.

2. By consent of parties, Mr.Anil Mehta, advocate practicing in this court is appointed as an arbitrator for adjudication of the dispute between the parties under the arbitration agreement.

3. The petitioners undertake to file written statement before the learned arbitrator within three weeks from today along with all documents proposed to be relied upon by the petitioners and shall serve a copy thereof upon the respondent's advocate simultaneously. It is made clear that no further extension of time would be granted.

4. The respondent is directed to furnish copies of all the documents and evidence whatever proposed to be relied upon by the respondent before the learned arbitrator to the petitioners' advocate within one week from today.

5. None of the parties shall take any unnecessary adjournment before the learned arbitrator.

6. The fees and expenses of the learned arbitrator shall be paid by both the parties equally at the first instance.

7. The learned arbitrator shall make an endevour to dispose of the arbitral proceedings within a period of six months from the date of the first meeting.

::: Uploaded on - 20/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 01:26:47 :::

kvm 3/3 6-ARBP164.19

8. The learned arbitrator shall decide the matter afresh without being influenced by the observations made and the conclusion drawn in the arbitral award dated 22nd September,2017 and in accordance with law.

9. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any views on the merits of the matter.

10. All contentions of both the parties are kept open.

11. Arbitration petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.

12. In view of the disposal of the arbitration petition, Notice of Motion No.247 of 2019 does not survive and is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.

[R.D.DHANUKA, J.] ::: Uploaded on - 20/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2019 01:26:47 :::