Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs Ridge Innovation Pvt. Ltd. And Rajan ... on 19 October, 2018

Author: G.S. Patel

Bench: G.S. Patel

                                                         913-CHSCDL1413-18.DOC




 Arun



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                     IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
            CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 1413 OF 2018
                                        IN
      COMM EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1642 OF 2018


Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd                                              ...Applicant
      In the matter between
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd                                                ...Plaintif
      Versus
Ridge Innovation Pvt Ltd                                            ...Defendant
      And
Bhalchandra V Datar & Ors                                            ...Proposed
                                                                     Defendants


Mr Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate, with Ms SI Joshi and Ms
     Nikita Pawar, i/b SI Joshi & Company, for the Applicant.
Ms Mallika Taly, with Mr Mukul Taly and Mr Vitobha Masurkar, i/b
     S Mahomedbhai & Company, for the Defendants.
Mr Dandapani Brahma, Executive Vice-President (Product Head) of
     the Applicant, present.


                               CORAM:      G.S. PATEL, J
                               DATED:      19th October 2018
PC:-


 1.      There is an Affidavit dated 19th October 2018 affirmed by Mr
 Dandapani Brahma, the Executive Vice-President (Product Head),




                                     Page 1 of 3
                                 19th October 2018

::: Uploaded on - 23/10/2018                         ::: Downloaded on - 25/10/2018 23:28:40 :::
                                                        913-CHSCDL1413-18.DOC




 of the Applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd ("KML"). It will be
 filed in the Registry after correct continuous pagination. Mr Brahma
 is present in court.


 2.      I have seen the Affidavit. It contains an unconditional apology
 in paragraphs 1 to 5 and thereafter ofers an explanation of sorts to
 justify KML's masking out or obscuring portions of the
 transactional documents of 31st March 2003, 31st March 2004 and
 21st March 2006. As I noted in my order of 16th October 2018, this
 masking / concealment was not only in the copies given to the other
 side represented by Ms Taly but was even in the original Affidavit
 filed in Court, as annexures to that Affidavit. I impounded those
 three documents. They have been brought to Court today.


 3.      Mr Sancheti has instructions to state, and as an officer of the
 Court he accepts, that this kind of concealment could never have
 been done from anything tendered to Court. That is an absolutely
 correct statement and is accepted as such. He seeks leave, again on
 instructions, to withdraw the present Chamber Summons with
 liberty to file a fresh Chamber Summons annexing complete copies
 with no attempt at concealment or masking of any of these three
 supporting documents. I will grant him that leave and that liberty on
 the condition that the entire set of correspondence between KML,
 the original Award Holder Tata Finance Limited ("Tata Finance")
 and Datar Switchgear Limited ("Datar Switchgear") or its
 successors in title are annexed in its entirety so that there is no
 controversy about this going forward. I am not accepting the
 justification or explanation in paragraph 6 of the present Affidavit or




                                   Page 2 of 3
                               19th October 2018

::: Uploaded on - 23/10/2018                       ::: Downloaded on - 25/10/2018 23:28:40 :::
                                                        913-CHSCDL1413-18.DOC




 any further paragraphs but will grant the liberty and the leave simply
 on Mr Sancheti's statement made on instructions.


 4.      The documents in question will be returned by the
 Prothonotary and Senior Master to the Advocates for the Applicant
 once the masking is removed in the presence of the Prothonotary
 and Senior Master. Chamber Summons (L) No. 1413 of 2018 is
 dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.


 5.      The Respondent, Ridge Innovations Private Limited

("RIPL"), has filed a Chamber Summons (L) No. 1559 of 2018 under Section 340 read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ("CrPC"). A copy has just been served on the Advocates for KML. I will list this Chamber Summons by RIPL on 31st October 2018.

6. I expect that by that date KML will have filed and served its own fresh Chamber Summons. Both matters will be listed on the supplementary board on that day.

7. The previous order permitting Ms Taly to take colour photocopies of the documents (both with and without masking) is continued and those certified copies will be issued before the documents are returned to the Advocate for KML.

(G. S. PATEL, J) Page 3 of 3 19th October 2018 ::: Uploaded on - 23/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 25/10/2018 23:28:40 :::