Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Arss-Suresh Balaji(Iv) vs State Of Haryana & Another on 11 March, 2014

Bench: Hemant Gupta, Anita Chaudhry

              CWP No.28779 of 2013(O&M)                                                    -1-


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                                              CHANDIGARH

                                                                         CWP No.28779 of 2013(O&M)
                                                                          Date of decision:11.03.2014


              ARSS-Suresh Balaji(IV), New Delhi                                    .... Petitioner

                                                            versus

              State of Haryana & another                                           .... Respondents


              CORAM:                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
                                    HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

              Present:              Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

                                    Ms. Shubhra Singh, DAG, Haryana.

                                                  *****

              Hemant Gupta, J.(Oral)

Challenge in the present petition is to legality of proviso of Rule 9 of Haryana Minor Mineral Concession Stocking and Transportation of Minerals and Prevention of illegal Mining Rules, 2012. The relevant clause reads as under:

"9. Grant of Mining Lease through competitive bidding (1) Any minor mineral deposits, where the government decides such areas to be operated under a lease, may be granted on mining lease for a period not less than 10 years but not exceeding 20 years following a competitive bid process as provided under Chapter 7 of these rules:
Provided that the government may, wherever it deem necessary, pre-qualify the bidders, with the pre- qualification criteria determined upfront, by inviting expression of interest through a. public notice, and limit the bidding process among such pre-qualified bidders."

In short reply filed by learned State counsel, it has been Bura Sonia 2014.03.13 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CWP No.28779 of 2013(O&M) -2- averred that legality of Rule 9 has been upheld by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.18509 of 2012 titled as Manoj Kumar vs. State of Haryana & others vide order dated 23.01.2013.

Though such reply was filed on 19.01.2014, the petitioner has chosen not to file any rejoinder.

In view of the reasons recorded in Manoj Kumar's case, we do not find any merit in the writ petition. The writ petition is thus, dismissed.




                                                                 (HEMANT GUPTA)
                                                                      JUDGE



              11.03.2014                                       (ANITA CHAUDHRY)
              sonia                                                   JUDGE




Bura Sonia
2014.03.13 15:37
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
chandigarh