Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Pathan Madeena Khan, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 24 March, 2021

Author: Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

Bench: Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISIDICTION)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH RQY¥'

WRIT PETITION NO: 1174 OF 2021
Between:
Pathan Madeena Khan, S/o Late Mastan, ... Petitioner
AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal
Administration and Urban Development, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

2. The Commissioner and Director,, Municipal Administration and Urban
Development, 5th Lane, Annapurna Nagar, Gorantla, Guntur.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,, Gurazala, Guntur District.

4. The Piduguralla Municipality,, Rep.by its Commissioner, Piduguralla, Guntur
District.

5. The Tahsildar, Piduguralla Mandal, Piduguralla, Guntur District.

... Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of
Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 4 and 5 and their staff in making
attempts to lay Tar Road in around 50 cents of petitioners land in an extent of Ac.1-50
cents in Survey No. 892/4 situate at Piduguralla, Guntur District, without following the
due process of law and resorting to acquisition of land under The Right to Fair
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement
Act, 2013, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the
Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and
consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to lay Tar Road Tar Road in
around 50 cents of petitioners land out of an extent of Ac.1-50 cents in Survey No.
892/4 situate at Piduguralla, Guntur District, without following the due process of law or
disturb the possession of the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct
the 4° & 5" respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in the
name of laying Tar Road in around 50 cents of petitioner's land out of an extent of Ac.
1-50 cents in Survey No. 892/4 situate at Piduguralla, Guntur District, without following
the due process of law, pending disposal of WP 1174 of 2021, on the file of the High
Court.

The petition *coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit
filed in support thereof and the Order of High Court dated 18-01-2021,03.02.2021 &
03.03.2021 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A. Venkata Durga
Rao Advocate for the Petitioner, GP for Municipal Administration for Respondent Nos. 1
& 2, GP for Revenue for Respondent No.3 and of Sri O. Manohar Reddy, Standing
Counsel for Respondent No.4, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

* At request for filing counter affidavit, time extended by three weeks. Interim order granted earlier is extended till then." To Sd/-E, Kameswara Rao--. ep etRae AICER SECTI [TRUE COPY// wONS . For . One CC to Sri A. Venkata Durga Rao, Advocate [OPUC] . Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] . One spare copy PR HIGH COURT CMR,J DATED:24/03/2021 ORDER WP.No.1174 of 2021 INTERIM ORDER IS EXTENDED LAS aah foal.

LE ge CNEL C&y. Y t 5 fy TM cae ee we, oes, we we EAt ANDAR SS Mo Oh.

Thy:

OM! mye SS SA