Gujarat High Court
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Kalupur Commercial Co-Op.Bank ... on 16 August, 2017
Author: Akil Kureshi
Bench: Akil Kureshi, Biren Vaishnav
O/TAXAP/596/2017 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
TAX APPEAL NO. 596 of 2017
==========================================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1....Appellant(s)
Versus
KALUPUR COMMERCIAL CO-OP.BANK LTD.....Opponent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MRS SWATI SOPARKAR, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 16/08/2017
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1. Revenue is in appeal against the judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 17.08.2016 raising the following question of law for our consideration:
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting disallowance of business expenditure amounting to Rs.1,07,11,630/-?
2. The issue pertains to allowability of a certain claim of the assessee of business expenditure. Assessing Officer as well as Commissioner (Appeals) found that the expenditure Page 1 of 4 HC-NIC Page 1 of 4 Created On Tue Aug 22 05:46:10 IST 2017 O/TAXAP/596/2017 ORDER was not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business. Tribunal reversed such findings making following observations:
"5.4 We have heard both sides, perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. The main source of income of the assessee is that of receipt of interest realized on the advances made by the bank and out of the total advances outstanding at the end of the year at Rs.735.36 crores which comprises more than 98% of total advances. The principal source of recurring income of the assessee is from the members and therefore the expenditure for keeping members' support and attraction towards the bank is wholly and exclusively necessary for the purpose of business. The Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat (Full Bench) in the case of Karjan Co- operative Cotton Sales Ginning Pressing Society (supra) has held that it was absolutely necessary for the assessee to maintain goodwill amongst its members and to lure them to continue to do their business with the society if it give presents to its members and to commemorate silver jubilee celebrations, it could not be said that the society was not doing something as a prudent business.
5.5 Reliance is also placed in the case of CIT vs. Dascroi Taluka Coop Purchase & Sales Union Ltd, 126 ITR 413 of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court judgment, where it was held that the amount spent by the assessee society on purchase of stainless steel utensils and other for the purpose of tour expenses of members was considered to be business expenditure within the meaning of Section 37 of the Act.
5.6 Considering to the above stated facts and circumstances the volume of earning of the assessee bank are mainly made through its members. These expenses are incurred by the assessee bank to attract the members confidence and loyalty towards the bank in the prevailing competition so that, the members place their Page 2 of 4 HC-NIC Page 2 of 4 Created On Tue Aug 22 05:46:10 IST 2017 O/TAXAP/596/2017 ORDER deposits with the assessee bank and also continue to borrow funds from the assessee bank in order to improve the profit earning and income of the assessee bank. We have also considered that the amount spent on the aforesaid expenditures is very marginal compared to the amount of interest realised on the advances made to the members by the bank and amount of deposit made by the members with the bank. Under these circumstances the amount spent on scholarship to the children of members, payment to legal heirs of members and gifts to members could be said to be expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business since the amount was spent for keeping alive its good image amongst its members and ensuring that goodwill and continuity of business with the members. In view of above mentioned facts and circumstances, we find that the assessee had incurred above stated expenditure for promoting the business, even though there is no legal obligation to incur these expenditure but the assessee had incurred it for preserving business connection and goodwill of the business. Therefore, in view of above findings, we allow the aforesaid expenditure as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Act.
3. It can thus be seen that the Tribunal accepted the assessee's version that the expenditure was incurred for the purpose of business to maintain goodwill and continuity of business being provided by important members. It was pointed out that these members had provided for nearly 98% of the bank's business and the expenditure was marginal as compared to the interest realised on advances made to such members by the bank and the amount of deposits made by the members with the bank. The Tribunal held that merely because there was no legal obligation to incur such expenditure would not mean that the same was not allowable business expenditure if it could be pointed out that the Page 3 of 4 HC-NIC Page 3 of 4 Created On Tue Aug 22 05:46:10 IST 2017 O/TAXAP/596/2017 ORDER expenditure incurred in preserving the business connections and goodwill of business.
4. No question of law arises. Tax appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (BIREN VAISHNAV, J.) divya Page 4 of 4 HC-NIC Page 4 of 4 Created On Tue Aug 22 05:46:10 IST 2017