Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Amit Meharia vs Abhilasha Malhotra & Ors on 25 January, 2021

Author: Arindam Sinha

Bench: Arindam Sinha

25.01.2021
Item No. 05
Ct. No. 04
PG




                               F.A.T. 330 of 2020
                                      with
                            I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020
                                      With
                               I.A. No. 2 of 2020
                             (Via Video Conference)
                                          r




                                 Amit Meharia
                                       Vs.
                           Abhilasha Malhotra & Ors.


              Mr. Sachin Datta, sr. adv.
              Ms. Paramita Banerjee...........for appellant

              Mr. Chandra Sekhar Jha.......for respondents

Mr. Jha, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondents and submits, 30 volumes of paper books have been served. He requires a month's time to make himself ready. He waives notice of appeal.

Mr. Datta, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of appellant and submits, an assurance given by respondent no. 1 to effect that she would not enter the office of appellant in New Delhi was extended as interim order till 14 th January, 2021 (by order dated 7th January, 2021). He wants the assurance or order to restrain said respondent from approaching his client's residence, also in New Delhi. Mr. Jha submits, his client has no intention of paying a visit to appellant's residence in New Delhi. 2 Court is satisfied that appellant need not have any apprehension from respondent no. 1 regarding his stay and work at New Delhi.

By consent, list the appeal for hearing on 8 th March, 2021.

(Arindam Sinha, J.) (Suvra Ghosh, J.)