Karnataka High Court
Smt. Rudramma vs The Government Of Karnataka on 26 October, 2010
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
Bench: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF RARNAYAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 26*" DAY OF OCTOBER 2010
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE MR.3usT1cE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NQ§.§2Q7-§§2§[2Q1Q (QM;-._I3_i-;§V 1':-(V: V.
Begwggn :
1. SMT. RUDRAMMA
W/O BORAIAH
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
2. SMT. CHOWDAMMA
W/O NINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT so YEARS
3. SMT SANNAMMA
W/O ERAIAH
4.
W/O KEN'c,HA1A,_H v
AGED ABQUT, S}'._YEA_F<Sz_
_ 5. B~ORA:v§MA.
. '-W/O:,.;Mu*rTABORA'IA'H'
' - .,AGEVDvAa.OuT_ 53 YEARS
6." ._
A VW/O SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
Y SSMTJAYAMMA
V 'Ow/O REVAIAH
=-A_c5ED ABOUT 69 YEARS
II.
14.
SMT LEELAVATHI
W/O CHIKKAVENKATAIAH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
SMT GOWRAMMA
W/O SANNHUDAGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
SMT MADAMMA
W/O KULLAJOGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
SMT LAKSHMAMMA
W/O VEERABADRAIAH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
SMT CH ELUVAMMA
W/O CHIKKAVENKATAIAB _
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS ~ -
SMT SIDDAMMA. A
W/O LATE GOvLND.A1A;H I
AGED ABOOT 57,sYEARs.
W/O CSOVINDAIAE-.+=.
AGED ABOUT 42. YEARS'
sMT4.cH1K+u<"ABéMA.Y"
MO LAET :<uLLA.B_ORA1AH
"A V' « AGED:ABOufr 50 YEARS
MT "M.AHA'DEvAMMA
" ._ 'Wj/O 'szD.DA1AY:-A
AGED A.BO'iU?" 70 YEARS
Sm RAVDTYEA
w/O 'KRISHNA
" AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
SMT LAKSHMAMMA
;W/O CHIKKAIAH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
2().
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
.28.
SMT VENKATALAKSHMAMMA
W/O LATE A v BORAIAH
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
SMT SHIVAMMA
W/O VENKATAIAH
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
SMT DUNDAMMA
W/O LATE THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
SMT PARVATHAMMA
W/O BORALINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
SMT VENKATAMMA
W/O VENKTAIAH
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
SMT VENKATAM MA
W/O KENCHABORAIAH
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS . '
SMT1.:THIM_AM'AKKA
w/O"KART1YARP'A.:'-~.._ _ 1_
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
SMT HON°NAMM.A ._
vvgjo' LATE SA'MJ?ANGA1[AH
A[G:EL§_._ABO UT 70 RS
fs MT AM~MA_N'AMMA
. W/O LATE MNGAIAH
~. AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
SMT AVl:\3.IT'§4i;A
w/O SADASHIVA
A A__GED"ABOUT 48 YEARS
29. A
1' SMT BORAMMA
gW/O MALLANINGAIAE-I
r AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
3-
30.
32.
34.
36.
SMT NARASAMMA
W/O GOVINDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
SMT GIRIJAMMA
W/O NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
SMT PUTFAMMA
W/O LATE RANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA
W/O SHIVAN NA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEAP.S~.__
SMT SIDDAMMA
w/0 SUBBAEAHV A
AGED ABOUT 52' YEARS
SMT SA1D__.A 53:,
w/0 MABOOB
AGED.AE§QUT_"5G~1.:YEAES" "
SMT:qAYAEA§<Ss!-M_;3.'mMA"'~-
w/o C.HIKKAMUTAIAH
AGED ABOUT S7-YEATRSV
SMT..E.YRA'mA -A
vwéo MD'UTl'AIAH-Y.
AGED..;ABDur 59 YEARS
' SMT PRAs'r=-sAV'ATH1 BAI
W,' O SA'J]Ai'iR-A-0 BAG LE
" AGED ABOUT1' 47 YEARS
Sm" M'AD'D"{J RAM MA
w/0" HANUMAIAH
" A AGED'ABouT 51 YEARS
MANJULA
'iw/0 DODDAMAHADEVAIAH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
' 42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
A 50.
SMT SHIVAMMA
W/O NAGARALFU
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
SMT RATHNAMMA
W/O NAGARALFU
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
SMT SHARJAN
W/O JANPASHA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
SMT MANGALAMMA
w/o CHELUVAIAH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS~.__
SMT SAMSAD
w/0 ILIYAJ 7 'V
AGED ABOUT.' '{.EAR§S
SMT FATH.:«rv:A.'__ 'll. '
w/0 ANIF F?AS_HA _ «_
AGEDABQU*f_39'1--?~{}EARS_' '
SMT :sHA;<EE'LA.V _'
w/0 RIYAZ ' _ j .
AGED-ABOUT 38-YEARS '
SMT SUNANDA '
w/,0 MARUTHI ~
' _ Ac;E~Ds,.A,soufr 39 YEAR's
' ,.S'i'~1T N.A'RAsA'MMA
'..-/o;LA;<.sHMIN--ARAs:MHA;AH
HAGED A's0Lfr,I42 YEARS
Sr??? SHAARDJHAMMA
w/o"aA'1t-'E MALLEGOWDA
A *.&;GfED ABOUT 53 YEARS
'~._VS'ivfi' YASHODHAMMA
2W/O THIMMAIAH
A - VAGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
S9.
60'
SMT RENUKAMMA
W/O KEREHANUMAIAHA
AGED ABOUT 40EARS
SMT VENKATAMMA
W/O LATE \/ENKATAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
SMT ASHWINI
W/O RAJASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
SMT SHAHSIKALA
W/O P M RAJU
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.__
SMT DEVAMMA @ :<ARLAiv:;MA""
w/0 MARIYAPPA '
AGED ABOUT 7.2fY.EAR.;3
SMT RAT!-jE\l'AF4_MA "
w/0 CHEEDVAIAH _ U'
AGED A.aQuI_62'1Y_EARs' '
SMT
w/o N'ARA.sIw1HVA~AAo
AGED ABOUT 64'~YEARS_
SMT DEVAIYTIV1-AAA
w/D. DODDAPU'F?«I.A_H};
.. .. AA'GED5»--AAsOALnf 52 YEARS
_ V-sTMTEDREI»1Dr:A'wj:MA
" ._w'1o "
AGED AE5CU_T'42 YEARS
SMT ..RATH'NAM MA
w/o PUTTASWAMIAHA
A "AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
A 'fS"rv;T MANJULA
2W/O SHIVANANDHA
.--AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
7 '
473,
SMT PADMAVATHI
W/O BETTASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
SMT VIJAYA
W/O SHIVARAJU
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
SMT REKHA
W/O BETTASWAMY GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
SMT BORAMMA
W/O LATE SIDDIAHA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
SMT LAKSHMAMMA
w/o SHETTIAHA 'V
AGED ABOUTv49&'YE_ARf$
SMT JAYA MAMA
w/o MARl'SWAM3Y
AGEDvA13QU*E4'3'«1Y.EARSj" "
SMT %.{ARA=EA':{SHM1"'wY _
w/o KALAIAHA. " *
AGED ABOUT 37'-YE'ARS. J
SMT-MUTHAMYIA ~
w/Q RUTrAswAav!2:AHA.
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
MT MA r<i§H«.A
'w:/Q SvI.D~DHA.n>i.A~R1YARRA
AGED ABDr.;T.&:9 YEARS
SMT LA--é<s£--ai§4IDEvAMMA
w/0 KARIYAPPA
. ~AG._ED ABOUT 47 YEARS
A' 1..'sMTAY"RREMA
agv/0 MARIDEVARU
.. _..AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81 .
32,
33.
SMT SIDDHAMMA
W/O LATE SABAGIAHA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
SMT SHOBHA
W/O SRINIVAS BETTASWAMY GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
SMT BHAGYALAKSHMI
W/O KENCHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
SMT VENKATAM MA
W/O KESHAV
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS~..V_A
SMT THIMMAKKA
w/o MUNIYAPPA A
AGED ABOUT 59' Y--E_AR:'f§
SMT NAc3Am'4A '
W/O RAMA{<R:=:_s1¢:_ NA2I'A'H<:."'i.':,V9_'
AGED_ATB3QAUTS_58"%€EARS V
SMT :'c:--:II«::<A;§é1:'»'*.A--_.""A "
w/0 VENK«ATESHV
AGED AEQUT 39'YEAR:'5 V
SMT x_.AKs:--i'MA'MMA
w,~::) SIDDARAJU--~
V' . AGED ?A£>'O"U.T 40 vE'A'FiS
' .=S§\riVT_Lr'\4+:<OST§f'M:AP-4MA
. w-,_'o V'-ENKVATESH
'AGED ABDETAV32 YEARS
SW SUNANIDAM MA
W/O ''F?..VEI%-iUKAIAH
' *A_G_ED ABOUT 43 YEARS
MT' JAYAMMA
W/O NARAYAN
-"AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
86.
89.
90.
92.
.93;
SMT KALAMMA
W/O NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
SMT SHIVAMMA
W/O RAMAKRISHNA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
SMT MANGALAMMA
W/O T K RAM ESH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
SMT MANGAMMA
W/O LATE MUDDARANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA
W/O T R RAJU
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
SMT MANGALAM MA
W/O RAGU
AGED ABOUT 36 YEAPJ3' - A
SMT:';NAR_A3ESA3A3iE"-'IMAE'. * A
w/o T_HI'M_MAIAHf'=«.
AGED ABOUT 40. YEARS'*--.. '
SMT.,HoM'SAAéM'A.
vwzo Ci*4IKKAKE--N«CHAPPA
AGAED;-ABOUT 64 YEARS
SMT '3~.1'DY:§Afi/1i~1A
'W/O YJAVARAIA-H
" AGED Aeojuf 40 YEARS
SEAT N3A.(3'A"|Y| M A
W/O LATE SRINIVAS
' AA Ag3ED"ABouT 50 YEARS
SMT MANJULA
§W/O BASAVALINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
96.
97.
98.
99.
I 00.
102.
103.
'I'-'J4
SMT GOWRAMMA
W/O NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
SMT SHIVAMMA
W/O KEMPARAJU
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
SMT MANJULA
W/O T R ALAGIRIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
SMT PARVATHAMMA
W/O KARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
SMT SHASHIKALA
W/O DHANANEAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
SMT vENAKTAHANuM.Ai<.IgA
W/O PUTASEENA " . 5 _ .
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
S MT:':cH1_K*:<AHA..Nu}vi: _ "' ..
W/O RAGAVEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
SMT--vGSOwR;AMAMA
W;';Q HANUMAIAH... _____ ., .
. A ADGEIEABOEJT 64 YEARS
SMT 'G4O'w'RA:M'*MA
" . 'W/O "LATE ALAGIRIYAPPA
'I05.
' AGED AB'O]L|T' 69 YEARS
SEAT YASHDDHAMMA
W/O PRABHU
" 'AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
;W/O SHANKARREDDY
I AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
'SMT LALITHAM MA
107.
108.
109.
110.
1 1 1.
112.
H3.
H4.
I16.
SMT CHANDRAMMA
W/O RAJU
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
SMT AMBUJA
W/O LOKESH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
SMT NAGAMMA
W/O RAMESH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
SMT LINGAMARIYAMMA
W/O APRAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS~.__
SMT VASANTHA
w/0 UMESH _
AGED ABouT_ 49 'r.EAR;j5
SMT PAN KAJA,
-11-
w/0 KRIsHNEGD\}V'DA
AGED_ A.BVQUT_'52~1.:\(:EAR.s" "
SMT:'L_AK.SHEY§A"5I3MA"~ "
W/O KEMP.ARA.NG.A;AH'..V_'--
AGED ABOUT 49'-YEARS V
SMT ERANGAMMAVV
w,ri3 ANANTHA'P--EA,_
V' 1. A AGE DiA:BO--U.T 70 YE"A'Eis
's"MT_ GANf5Ai§}I'r~eA
W/Q s.AfwJEE.vE-A--i'AH
AGED AB'OiUTE1'62 YEARS
SMT VARALAKSHMI
w/0'*:<u'MAR
* A€3"ED ABOUT 50 YEARS
MT PARVATHAMMA
Ew/0 SIDDARAJU
_;AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
118.
(By Sri M SE-IIVAPRAKASH & B.R. MURALAIDI-IA4R,jj.A'DV'§3;.:Q}:
SMT CHIKKATAYAMMA _ 12 _
W/O BOREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
SMT UMA
W/O SRIKANTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
ABBANAKUPPE VILLAGE
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT
RAMANAGAR.
P~..I\J_.D....I.
1.
5:.'
THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY "
VIOHANA SOUDHA
BANGALORE.
TH E 'RAJI\"f* <3fA_N DH I ' RURAL _
HOUFSING DVEIKEL-O FME¥\JT*L__TD. ,
BY ITS MANAGINGI<.DIR,EC-TOR
O/AT 47*} FLOOR, KHs..C'OM'PLEx
KAVERI BHAVAN
I<.;a;R,OAo, BANGALORE.
'A _''THE ISEPIETY QOMVMAIGSIONER
* 'RAMA_N'A(3ARA__DISTRICT
_3AMANAGARA,
TH E T.A.H'sI.LOAR
R"AMANAG'ARA DISTRICT
RAMAN:AGARA.
" , THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
'TALUK PANCHAYATH
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT
I RAMANAGARA.
. ._ . s>ET.i?fIO'I¥IERs
-13-
6. THE SECRETARY
ITTAMADU GRAM PANCHAYATH
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT
RAMANAGARA. RES Po_N.pE.r$i'rs'wn;. ~ V.
(By Sri S.B. SHAHAPUR, AGA., FOR R1, R3 AND R4«}~-»....:f..
These Writ Petitions are filed unde,r"Articies' &_:3227
of the Constitution of India pra.yi'Rg to ca§i'...fo'r the entire
records on the file of the respondent N'o..3_ to 25 dated
6.10.2007 and dated 8.10..201Q..0'n--t_he File of the*re'spondent authorities and quash the----._irnpu--gned, ordrers, communications at Annexure~D dated 6.1.2010, }'\.ri'nex_ure?jE dated 8.1.2010, Annexure~--F dated 11.1.2010,_a1nci--.co,nséquénti'y to direct the respondent auth0--riti--es ito, i_ssu.e"'~.'i§»h,ata':' and supportive documents in respec't_of'*th.e sites». granted under Ashraya Scheme.
These1~-\iiI,rjét'1.i5et'itiensi--'corriirig"Von"§for preiiminary hearing in 'B' group thi_si'da-y,,Vn_the Cotirt made the following :
Petitioners arepraying for quashing Annexures--'D', 'E' i"'1'i."3§'te4 6.1.2010, 8.1.2010 and 11.1.2010 res--pect!\fei§};«1..an'ndA'.i'nf0:r a direction to the respondent-«authorities "to issue kaatirsaeaind supportive documents in respect of the " granted under the Ashraya Scheme. V/5 _ }4 _
2. According to the petitioners, they were issued with sites measuring within the dimension of 30 x 25 ft. under the Social Welfare Measures in Abbanakuppe_.:":tti:'ijl«alg'e, Ramanagara Taluk, and other villagers. It is their A-
the Deputy Commissioner has passedman arbitrVaryjv»orderAVto_V take away the lands granted to them.'by'_'_'co'nv'e~rti'ng'V the plots under the Ashraya Ho'uVsig'n~.q_Sc'h'erine».
3. Learned counsel,appearing"for-resoondientsfi5 and 6 submitted that the havi_ng noticed that the land which" eariier'R:ide:nt:ifi.edV'- ear marked for aliotmentjhvloiy and others was not available « an arbitrary decision was taken ear.iier, ordered to take suitable action to identify the yben'aefi.ciAarl*es anddtoigrant them sites/plots. According to the same is in order and does not caii for int.e_rferenc'e.-.il
4. " Learned Government Advocate submits, earlier F§'a'_i<ku"'Patras were not issued. Although according to the K'---.."Voetitioners, they were issued with such Hakku Patras, no W ..15- records are available and as such, the Deputy Commissioner has taken a decision to properly identify the benyeficiaries through Grama Sabha and thereafter, to of sites to them.
It is further submitted that inglthe absen:ce'~ authentic record available with t'he""i'espond.entauthprities for if having so granted/allotte'd.,_sites,_the. :Oe.puty 'Commissioner has passed appropriate not call for interference.
S. copies of some of the Hakku Ftatras. .Vif'~ajc.colrdi'zl~..g'to'the petitioners, they have got any record Haki<"u_ them, they can approach the ,.v.,ADepu.t:§,{.'vC~ommi's's-ionerg On verification, if the Deputy A"x_VCoVm--mVissio~ner/Taluk Executive Officer finds that the same a'.r'ex"niotvv.Vip'_",:..o,i:d'er, the authority may make alternative 'yarranfégemvenhtfffwor else by virtue of Hakku Patras already "'¢.:s;ssu'fE:'d.,, and if the iand is avaiiable and identified, the prayers oftthfeffpetitioners may be considered if such Hakku Patras are found to be genuine. Or else, the order passed by the H
--I6w Deputy Commissioner to identify the beneficiaries in the Grama Sabha to make aliotment, wouid sustain":fl'f2£t"'~is relevant to note here itself that similar order this court: in Writ Petition Nos.1454-1.45s9/20_iO''('i<iL;i2jfu'_ngie-: "
similar circumstances.
Accordingiy, the Writ petitio'ns"are disposed *bk/nk