Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sanjiv Kaushal vs State Of Haryana on 26 February, 2016
Author: M.M.S. Bedi
Bench: M.M.S. Bedi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(208) CRM-M-1254-2016
Decided on: February 26, 2016.
Sanjiv Kaushal
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate, with
Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurdas Singh Salwara, DAG, Haryana.
M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL)
The portable ultrasound machine of the petitioner is alleged to have been used by the other persons while he was in Calcutta without any entries in the PNDT register.
Recoveries have already been effected. The petitioner has already joined investigation. The culpability of the petitioner in the transaction of raid dated 04.11.2015 will certainly be a debatable issue as he was admittedly not present when the alleged feotus test had been conducted.
Petitioner having joined investigation, he can be granted concession of bail.
Petition is allowed. It is ordered that in case of arrest of petitioner, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the following conditions:
(1) Petitioner will join investigation as and when required;HARSHA RANI 2016.02.26 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-1254-2016 -2-
(2) Petitioner will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner; and (3) Petitioner will not indulge in similar activity of which he is accused of, during the entire period of trial.
(M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE February 26, 2016 harsha HARSHA RANI 2016.02.26 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document