Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Md Sajit Alias Md Sajid And Anr vs The State Of Jharkhand on 26 February, 2015

Author: D. N. Upadhyay

Bench: D. N. Upadhyay

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                               B. A. No.61 of 2015
               1. Md. Sajit @ Md. Sajid.
               2. Md. Yusuf.                        .......... Petitioners.
                                     ­Versus­
            The State of Jharkhand.                .......... Opposite Party.
                                       ­­­­­­
               CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY
                                       ­­­­­­
            For the Petitioners :      Mr. A. K. Chaturvedi, Advocate
            For the State       :      A.P.P.
                                       ­­­­­­
03/26.02.2015

: Heard learned counsel for the parties. 

The   petitioners   are   accused   in   a   case   registered   under  Sections 341323324307147148149 and 504 of the Indian  Penal Code.

It is pointed out that Petitioner No.1­Md. Sajit @ Md. Sajid  has   been   declared   juvenile   and,   therefore,   learned   counsel  does not want to press bail application on behalf of Petitioner  No.1. 

In   view   of   the   said   submission,   prayer   for   bail   made   on  behalf of Petitioner No.1­Md. Sajit @ Md. Sajid stands rejected as  not pressed. 

  It   appears   from   the   first   information   report   that   all   the  accused   persons,   named   in   the   first   information   report,   after  forming   unlawful   assembly,   armed   with   lethal   weapon­Bhujali,  rod etc., came to the place and caused assault to the informant  and his family members. 

It is submitted that general and vague allegation has been  levelled   against   the   petitioner.   Save   and   except   he   was   also  present in the mob, no specific overt act committed by him has  been   disclosed.   He   has   remained   in   custody   for   about   two  months. 

Counsel for the State as well as informant have opposed  the petitioner's prayer for bail and submitted that grievous injuries  have been caused. The petitioner is prosecuted with the aid of  Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. 

 Be that as it may, no injured has stated that the petitioner  caused assault to him/her. 

­2­ In the  circumstances, Petitioner No.2­Md. Yusuf is directed  to   be   released   on   bail   on   furnishing   bail   bond   of   Rs.10,000/­  (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, each,  to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka,  in   connection   with   Dumka   (T)   P.S.   Case   No.278   of   2014,  corresponding to G.R. No.1549 of 2014. 

(D. N. Upadhyay, J.) Sanjay/