Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Madan Mohan Agrawal vs Ajay Kumar Agrawal 20 Wp227/42/2016 ... on 28 February, 2018

                                                                                    NAFR

                    HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                      WP227 No. 172 of 2018

           • Madan Mohan Agrawal S/o Late Shri Lakshmi Narayan Agrawal Aged About
             72 Years Resident Of Agrasen Road , Marathon Road Near Nutan Rice Mill
             Raipur District And Tehsil Raipur Chhattisgarh

                                                                             ---- Petitioner

                                             Versus

          1. Ajay Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Madan Mohan Agrawal Aged About 48 Years
             Resident Of Agrasen Road , Marathon Road Near Nutan Rice Mill Raipur
             District And Tehsil Raipur Chhattisgarh

          2. Deepak Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Madan Mohan Agrawal Aged About 44
             Years Resident Of Agrasen Road , Marathon Road Near Nutan Rice Mill
             Raipur District And Tehsil Raipur Chhattisgarh

          3. Neeraj Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Madan Mohan Agrawal Aged About 42
             Years Resident Of Agrasen Road , Marathon Road Near Nutan Rice Mill
             Raipur District And Tehsil Raipur Chhattisgarh

          4. Karnatak Bank Ltd. Branch Fafadih Chowk Near Sharda Hotel Raipur
             District And Tahsil Raipur Chhattisgarh

                                                                          ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Shri Abhuday Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 28/02/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the information received, the final orders have been passed in the case before the Court below, therefore, the petition has become infructuous.

2. In view of the above submission made, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/-

Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu