Karnataka High Court
Anil Kumar And Anr vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors on 22 August, 2022
Author: H.B.Prabhakara Sastry
Bench: H.B.Prabhakara Sastry
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL B. KATTI
CCC No.200063/2022 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
1. Sri Anil Kumar S/o Nagappa Wali
Aged about 40 years
Occ: Asst. Teacher
(Now been Relieved)
R/o Hondal village
Tq. Basavan Bagewadi
Dist. Vijayapur-586201
2. Sri Vittal S/o Nagappa Devangavi
Aged about 40 years
Occ: Asst. Teacher (Now been Relieved)
R/o Muttagi village
Tq. Basavan Bagewadi
Dist. Vijayapur-586201
... Complainants
(By Sri Ravi B.Patil, Advocate)
AND:
1. Sri N.V. Hosur S/o Not Known
Aged about 59 years
The Deputy Director
Public Instruction Department
CCC No.200063/2022
2
Vijayapur District Vijayapur-586203
... Accused No.1
2. Sri Sangamesh Pujari
S/o Not Known
Aged about 46 years
The Block Education Officer
Basavan Bagewadi
Tq. Basavana Bagewadi
Dist. Vijayapur-586203
... Accused No.2
3. The State of Karnataka
Through its Principal Secretary
Primary and Secondary
Education Department
Of Education, M.S. Building
Bengaluru-560 001
... Proforma Respondent
(By Sri Veeranagouda M. Biradar, AGA for A1 and A2;
Sri Mallikarjun C. Basareddy, Government Advocate for
proforma respondent)
This CCC is filed under Section 2 (B) read with Section 12
of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to initiate
proceedings against the accused for committing contempt of
lawful order passed in Writ Petition No.200972/2021 dated
31.08.2021 and punish the accused in accordance with law and
to pass such order/orders as this Court deems fit in the
circumstances of the case, including an order as to the costs of
the present proceeding, in the interest of justice and equity.
This CCC coming on for orders, through physical hearing/
video conference this day, Dr.H.B.Prabhakara Sastry J.,
made the following:
CCC No.200063/2022
3
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Advocate for respondents are physically present.
2. The respondent No.2/accused No.2 has filed an affidavit of compliance duly serving a copy thereof to the petitioners. The petitioners, after going through the affidavit, acknowledge the compliance of the direction given to the respondent Nos.4 and 5 in W.P.No.200972/2021 (S-RES) dated 31.08.2021 by the learned Single Judge this Court.
Since both side submit that the compliance of the direction has been made by the respondents herein, the petition stands closed.
Sd/-
JUDGE Sd/-
JUDGE swk