Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 2]

Madras High Court

Manikandan Vathan Chettiar vs Bar Council Of Tamil Nadu Thro' Its on 16 July, 2019

Author: N.Kirubakaran

Bench: N.Kirubakaran

                                                               1

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 16.07.2019

                                                          CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

                                                           AND

                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. PONGIAPPAN

                                                W.P.SR No. 53861 of 2016
                                                            &
                                          W.M.P. SR. Nos. 53864 to 53866 of 2016




                      1.    Manikandan Vathan Chettiar

                      2.    Mathankumar                                         ..Petitioners

                                                            Vs.

                      1.    Bar Council of Tamil Nadu thro' its
                            Secretary, High Court Buildings,
                            Chennai.

                      2.    Madras High Court thro' its
                            Registrar General,
                            High Court, Madras.

                      3.    Bar Council of India thro' its
                            Secretary, 21,
                            Rouse Avenue Institutional Area,
                            New Delhi.                                          ..Respondents
                      Prayer:     Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for
                      issue of a Writ of Declaration propounding the prohibitory order purportedly
                      issued in the name of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu in ROC 2793/15 dated



http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                 2

                      14.09.2015 as (a) being violative of Article 141 vis-a-vis the Supreme Court's
                      Constitution Bench in (1998) 4 SCC 409 (b) being actuated by sinister mala fide
                      and consequently direct payment of exemplary compensation of rupees 100
                      crores for the harassment meted out to the whistle blower petitioner and
                      keeping him away from law practice for 7 months besides tarnishing his
                      reputation and smothering the cases of all his humble clients in a hysterical act
                      of judicial revenge.
                                             For Petitioners     ::    Manikandan Vathan Chettiar
                                                                       Petitioner in person

                                             For Respondents     ::    Mr.R. Singgaravelan,
                                                                       Senior Counsel for
                                                                       Ms.M. Srividhya for R1
                                                                       Mr.C.T. Mohan for R2
                                                                       Mr.S.R. Rajagopal
                                                                       for R3
                                                               ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.) This matter is heard by way of 'video conferencing'.

2. The order challenged before this Court got merged with the order passed by the Bar Council of India and the order passed by the Bar Council of India has already been challenged before the Honourable Supreme Court by way of a statutory appeal. Therefore, it is open to the petitioners to work out their remedy in the appeal. With the above observation, the writ petition is closed at the SR stage itself. No costs. Connected W.M.P.SRs are closed.

(N.K.K.J.) (R.P.A.J.) nv 16.07.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in 3 To

1. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu thro' its Secretary, High Court Buildings, Chennai.

2. Madras High Court thro' its Registrar General, High Court, Madras.

3. Bar Council of India thro' its Secretary, 21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, New Delhi.

http://www.judis.nic.in 4 N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.

AND R. PONGIAPPAN,J.

nv W.P.SR. No. 53861 of 2016 16.07.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in