Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Shailam Khajanchi vs Ritesh Inani . on 18 November, 2016

Bench: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Uday Umesh Lalit

                                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                       CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

                                 TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO. 365 OF 2016


  SHAILAM KHAJANCHI AND ANR.                                              Petitioner(s)

                                                      VERSUS

  RITESH INANI AND ORS.                                                   Respondent(s)


                                                   O R D E R

Heard learned Senior counsel/counsel appearing for the parties.

The Transfer Petition is dismissed. However, we would request the High Court to consider appointing a Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae in the matter and decide the matter as expeditiously as possible.

No coercive steps be taken against the petitioners till the matter is decided by the High Court.

.......................... J. (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) .......................... J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) New Delhi;

November 18, 2016.



Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
R.NATARAJAN
Date: 2016.11.23
17:16:32 IST
Reason:
ITEM NO.71                      COURT NO.6                   SECTION XVIA

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F              I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Transfer Petition(s)(Criminal) No. 365/2016 SHAILAM KHAJANCHI AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RITESH INANI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay) Date : 18/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ankur Sood, AOR Ms. Prachi Johri, Adv.

Mr. Uday Bedi, Adv.

Ms. Romila Mandal, Adv.

Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal, Adv.

Ms. Sanchita A., Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, AOR Ms. Namita Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned Senior counsel/counsel appearing for the parties.

The Transfer Petition is dismissed. However, we would request the High Court to consider appointing a Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae in the matter and decide the matter as expeditiously as possible. No coercive steps be taken against the petitioners till the matter is decided by the High Court.



    (R. NATARAJAN)                                    (SNEH LATA SHARMA)
     Court Master                                        Court Master