Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court

S.K. Mal Commercial Services (P) Ltd. & ... vs The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors on 19 December, 2019

Author: Ravi Krishan Kapur

Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur

OD-100
                              WP 548 of 2010
                      IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                    Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                               ORIGINAL SIDE




            S.K. MAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES (P) LTD. & ANR.
                               Versus
              THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.


   BEFORE:
   The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
   Date : 19th December, 2019.


                                                                       Appearance:
                                                        Mr. Alok Kumar Ghosh, Adv.
                                                  Mr. Dilip Kumar Chatterjee, Adv.
                                                          Mr. Swapan Debnath, Adv.
                                                                    ...for the K.M.C

           The Court : None appears on behalf of the petitioner

 even in the second call.

           This   writ     petition    pertains      to    Drainage    Development

 charges    which    had    been      claimed   by     the   Kolkata    Municipal

 Corporation.

           It is submitted on behalf of the Corporation that in

 view of the decision passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in The

 Kolkata    Municipal      Corporation     &    Ors.      -vs-   Hindustan   Lever

 Limited & Ors. in APO No. 344 of 2009 with WP No. 2332 of 2003,

 the power and authority of the Corporation to claim Drainage

 Development charges has been upheld.                Counsel on behalf of the
 Corporation also submits that in view of the subsequent events

and the change of law nothing survives in the writ petition.

Additionally, the relevant section under challenge being Section

393 of the Kolkata Corporation Act has also been subsequently

upheld by the Hon'ble Division bench.

          There is nothing which the petitioner has been able to

show    to    controvert   the   submissions      made    on    behalf      of   the

respondent Corporation.

In such view of the matter, it is submitted that the instant writ petition being WP No. 548 of 2010 has become infructuous and no useful purpose would be served in keeping the same alive. The Corporation is at liberty to act in accordance with law.

Accordingly, WP No. 548 of 2010 stands dismissed. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.

(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.) SK.