Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Srirangam Koil Miras Kainkaryaparagal ... vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 14 May, 2025

Author: Rajesh Bindal

Bench: Rajesh Bindal

                                                   1

     ITEM NO.12                         COURT NO.7                SECTION XII

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Civil Appeal            No(s).   7692/2023

     SRIRANGAM KOIL MIRAS KAINKARYAPARAGAL
     MATRUM ATHANAI SARNTHA KOILGALIN
     MIRASKAINKARYAPARARGALIN NALASANGAM                          Appellant(s)

                                                  VERSUS

     THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.                                Respondent(s)

     [ONLY W.P.(C ) NO. 985/2023 AND D.NO. 3540/2025 IS LISTED UNDER
     THIS ITEM ]

     WITH
     W.P.(C) No. 985/2023 (X)
     IA No. 201522/2023 - APPLICATION FOR VACATION OF INTERIM ORDER
     IA No. 192269/2023 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
     IA No. 188675/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
     IA No. 188674/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
     IA No. 194308/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
     IA No. 187300/2023 - STAY APPLICATION
     IA NOS.122733/2025 – FOR INTERVENTION

     Diary No(s). 3540/2025 (XII)
     FOR ADMISSION
     IA No. 59315/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE
     DEFECTS, IA No. 59314/2025 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN
     PERSON

     Date : 14-05-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL

     For Appellant(s)             Mr. P. Valliappan, Sr. Adv.
                                  Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv.
                                  Mr. G. Balaji, AOR
                                  Mr. Neeleshwar Pavani, Adv.
                                  Ms. Arzu Paul, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                  Ms. Vaishnavi, Adv.
                                  Mr. Shiv Kumar, Adv.
Digitally signed by
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2025.05.20
17:14:14 IST
Reason:


                                  Petitioner-in-person

     For Respondent(s)            Mr. D. Kumanan, AOR
                                    2


                   Mr. P. S Raman Ag, Sr. Adv.
                   Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv.
                   Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv.
                   Mr. R. Shunmugasundaram, Sr. Adv.
                   Mr. E. R Elango, Sr. Adv.
                   Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari Aag, Sr. Adv.
                   Ms. Misha Rohatgi, AOR
                   Mr. N.r.r Arun Natarajan, Adv.
                   Mr. Nakul Mohta, Adv.
                   Mr. Ayush Kashyap, Adv.
                   Mr. Aditya Dhingra, Adv.
                   Mr. Amulya Upadhyay, Adv.
                   Ms. Ayushi Gaur, Adv.
                   Mr. Akshay Malpani, Adv.
                   Ms. Racheeta Chawla, Adv.
                   Ms. Shakeenaa, Adv.
                   Mr. Aswin Parsanna, Adv.
                   Mr. Agilesh Kumar S, Adv.
                   Ms. Devyani Gupta, Adv.
                   Ms. Tanvi Anand, Adv.
                   Ms. Nandini Agarwal, Adv.
                   Mr. A Renganath, Adv.
                   Mr. Suchindran B N, Adv.
                   Mr. Siddharth Sukumar, Adv.

                   Mr. M Sathyanarayanan, Sr. Adv.
                   Mr. B Karunakaran, Adv.
                   Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, AOR
                   Mr. Shubham Dubey, Adv.
                   Ms. Shruti Vaibhav, Adv.
                   Mr. Rushikanta Dash, Adv.

          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                             O R D E R

W.P.(C) No. 985/2023 AND SLP DIARY NO. 3540/2025:

IA No.122733/2025 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 985 of 2023 seeking intervention is allowed, without any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.
Cause title be amended within a period of one week. We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties.
After hearing the submissions made at length, we are inclined to record the statement made on behalf of the State of 3 Tamil Nadu that the Committee appointed by the High Court, is comprised of a person named Satyavel Murugan. The aforesaid person would be replaced, with a non-controversial person, to identify the number of Agama Temples as against the number of non-Agama Temples in the State of Tamil Nadu.
The entire identification exercise is expected to be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, liberty is given to the respondent-State of Tamil Nadu to fill up the vacancies in the non- Agama Temples, subject to strict compliance of the requisite customs, usage and practices and in light of the orders passed by this Court.
Insofar as Shri Arulmigu Ramanathaswamy Temple is concerned, without prejudice to the contentions of the parties, the Commissioner of the Tamil Nadu HR & CE Department is at liberty to fill up the existing vacancies for both Archakas and Maniyams, by strictly following the due procedure in the light of the requisite customs, usage and practices of the aforesaid temple and in light of the orders passed by this Court.
List these matters along with the main appeal on 18.09.2025.
(SWETA BALODI)                                               (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR