Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 18]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Smt. Urmila Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 February, 2020

Author: Nandita Dubey

Bench: Nandita Dubey

                                                            1                              WP-27410-2019
                               The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                          WP-27410-2019
                                   (SMT. URMILA TIWARI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS)

                     4
                     Jabalpur, Dated : 10-02-2020

                            Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
                            Ms. Devika Singh Thakur, learned Govt. Advocate for the State.
                            The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the
                     promotion granted to the respondent No.4 on the basis of her Caste

Certificate.

It is stated that the Caste Certificate has been issued from the office of District Magistrate, Hoogly West Bengal and same is not applicable in the State of Madhya Pradesh. A complaint in this regard has already been made by the present petitioner as she is claiming to be senior than the respondent No.4. It is submitted that a representation Annexure-P/9 is pending before the concerned authority/respondents No. 2 and 3 who may be directed to decide the same within the prescribed time.

Learned Government Advocate has no objection to the same prayer.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No. 2 and 3 Director, Medical Education and Joint Director Co- Superintendent, Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Rewa (MP) to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure-P/9) and pass a speaking and reasoned order within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of the certified copy of the order passed today.

However, it is made clear that this Court has not opined on merits of the case.

With the aforesaid directions, this petition stands disposed of.

Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR SHRIVASTAVA Date: 10/02/2020 16:59:36

2 WP-27410-2019 (NANDITA DUBEY) JUDGE rss Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR SHRIVASTAVA Date: 10/02/2020 16:59:36