Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

V Rama Devi vs Dinesh Khare on 21 April, 2015

Bench: J. Chelameswar, Adarsh Kumar Goel

         CHAMBER MATTER                                                    SECTION IVA

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                             R.P.(C) No. 696/2015 In S.L.P.(C) No. 32432/2013

         V RAMA DEVI                                                     Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

         DINESH KHARE AND ORS                                            Respondent(s)

         (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing review petition and office
         report)

         Date : 21/04/2015 This petition was circulated today.

         CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

                                        By Circulation

                              UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

The review petition is dismissed both on the ground of delay as well as on merit in terms of the signed order.




                         (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI)                    (PARDEEP KUMAR)
                          COURT MASTER                            AR-cum-PS

(Signed order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Deepak Mansukhani Date: 2015.04.22 10:48:45 IST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 696 OF 2015 IN SLP(C) NO(s). 32432 OF 2013 V RAMA DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DINESH KHARE AND ORS Respondent(s) O R D E R There is a delay of 285 days in filing the present review petition. The explanation offered in the application for condonation of delay is neither satisfactory nor reasonable. The application for condonation of delay is, therefore, rejected.

Even otherwise we have gone through the review petition and the connected records. We do not find any merit therein. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed both on the ground of delay and merit.

......................J. (J. CHELAMESWAR) ......................J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) NEW DELHI APRIL 21, 2015.