Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Shyam Sunder Verma vs Dharambir Jyanti on 6 November, 2012

Author: Ram Chand Gupta

Bench: Ram Chand Gupta

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT
                      CHANDIGARH

                                        Crl. Misc.-A 228-MA of 2011 (O&M)
                                        Date of Decision: November 6, 2012.


Shyam Sunder Verma
                                                  ...... PETITIONER(s)

                                      Versus

Dharambir Jyanti
                                                  ...... RESPONDENT (s)


CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA


Present:    Mr. Pankaj Maini,
            Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
                         *****

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)

CRM No.65001 of 2012 Heard.

In view of the facts mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and order dated 08.10.2012 dismissing the present application/appeal for non-prosecution is, hereby, recalled and application and appeal are restored at their original numbers.

CRM stands disposed of.

CRM-A 228-MA of 2011(O&M) The present application and appeal have been filed under Section 378(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure for granting Special Leave to Appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 31.05.2010 passed by learned Judicial CRM-A 228-MA of 2011 2 Magistrate First Class, Hisar under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 420 IPC.

Now after recent amendment in Section 372 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant-appellant is having right to appeal before court of sessions against judgment of acquittal passed by a Magistrate.

Hence, in this view of the matter, the present application and appeal are disposed of with liberty to applicant-appellant to file appeal before court of Sessions.

However, in case an application for condonation of delay is filed by applicant-appellant, the period spent by him in pursuing this application before this Court may be considered.

( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) November 6, 2012. JUDGE 'om'